From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#22831: [PATCH 2/2] WIP: gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references
	for openssl.
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 21:59:25 +0100
Message-ID: <87wppkeguq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <cover.1456792742.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<d59f912303428deb9ebbee6e3492edac988885f0.1456792742.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<20160301072025.GA26797@jasmine> <877fhmorj1.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160301210440.GA18336@jasmine> <877fhll18e.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160302192022.GD15618@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40349)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1abDsM-0008Tw-Gv
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:00:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1abDsI-0007j3-Rh
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:00:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32820)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1abDsI-0007iy-Nu
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:00:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1abDsI-0000rP-Hy
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:00:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22831.B22831.14569523783251@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160302192022.GD15618@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed,
	2 Mar 2016 14:20:22 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 22831@debbugs.gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:42:41AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>>=20
>> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:46:26PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> >> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>> >>=20
>> >> > From 00807e4421757f8d9204f1601de9a8286a408f91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2=
001
>> >> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>> >> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:24:20 -0500
>> >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references for open=
ssl.
>> >> >
>> >> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl)[arguments]: Add #:allowed-referenc=
es.
>> >>=20
>> >> For some reason I hadn=E2=80=99t seen it in M-x debbugs-gnu for this =
report
>> >> today, but the patch looks good to me!
>> >>=20
>> >> If we apply it now, it won=E2=80=99t trigger a rebuild (yay!), but wi=
ll still
>> >> trigger a bunch of regrafting, which is slightly annoying.  What about
>> >> applying it in the next =E2=80=98security-updates=E2=80=99 branch?
>> >
>> > Sure. Is it okay if I create that branch?
>>=20
>> Sure, no problem.
>
> Since there was already a security-updates job started, how about
> putting on core-updates?

Dunno, what does Mark think?  Let=E2=80=99s check with Mark on IRC.  :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.