From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:52:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87wph9b7qf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160527180331.GA22396@jasmine>
	<1475460073.24815.4.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> <87eg3wec5u.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1476565157.11070.10.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40145)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bvWt8-0005K9-Uu
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:53:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bvWt4-0007uy-50
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:53:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54895)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bvWt4-0007ur-1r
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:53:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bvWt3-0003kl-PK
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:53:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23633.B23633.147656834814389@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <1476565157.11070.10.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> (Adonay Felipe
	Nogueira's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:59:17 -0300")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org>
Cc: 23633@debbugs.gnu.org

Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> I was thinking of editing the current recipe so as to get the package
> from their current repository commit. What do you think? Should we do as
> I said just now, or should we do as you suggested?

I prefer to minimize changes compared to upstream=E2=80=99s release.  So th=
at
would mean turning your patch into a Guix patch.

Would it work for you?

Or we could wait for the next Artanis release if it=E2=80=99s going to happ=
en
soonish.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.