From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix
	logo
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:23 +0100
Message-ID: <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34852)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cHbgH-0007Qo-3U
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:27:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cHbgD-000608-Ti
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:27:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56063)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cHbgD-0005zx-R6
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:27:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cHbgD-0004lQ-MC
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:27:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25205.B25205.148182999518279@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe
	=?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Thu,
	15 Dec 2016 10:32:48 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Luis Felipe =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org>
Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello Felipe!

Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> Steps to reproduce
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html
> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button
>
>
> Unexpected behavior
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution.

The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the =E2=80=9CGNU
womb=E2=80=9D project at <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/womb>.  So in
general such reports should go to bug-womb@gnu.org.

However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly
superseded by the other one.  I=E2=80=99ve come to the conclusion that it=
=E2=80=99s
confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway.
:-)

WDYT?

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.