From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#27429: Stack clash (CVE-2017-1000366 etc) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:06:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87wp7ulftb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170619222550.GA29289@jasmine.lan> <20170620004920.GB31586@jasmine.lan> <20170620071857.GA2768@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <87shiumj05.fsf@netris.org> <20170621084134.GA2870@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170621095045.GB2870@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170621235227.GA4510@jasmine.lan> <20170622000336.GB4510@jasmine.lan> <87zid0iksk.fsf@netris.org> <87mv8rqcuu.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8yyn696.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQfiT-0006m3-AU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:07:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQfiQ-0000GM-LJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:07:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQfiQ-0000GI-He for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:07:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h8yyn696.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:49:41 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 27429@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> As discussed yesterday on IRC, here=E2=80=99s a patch that applies the g= libc >> patches for CVE-2017-1000366 in =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. >> >> That=E2=80=99s a rebuild-the-world change but we still have work to do in >> =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 anyway, notably regarding the Perl dot-in= -@INC issue. >> >> OK for you? > > Sounds good to me, but I've already merged 'master' into 'core-updates' > with this as a graft, so what's remains is to ungraft it there. Indeed. I rebased and adjusted the patch and pushed as 503a4df904b8d4b82caebdb17db9c5f76a952418. Leo, let me know when you feel that we should start a new evaluation. Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.