From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze)
Subject: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:14:40 -0400
Message-ID: <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35285)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hmLcy-0005OQ-O0
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:16:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hmLcw-0006U2-Q7
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:16:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34467)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hmLcw-0006Tj-AU
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:16:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hmLcw-0005B9-30
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:16:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36517.B36517.156303810419828@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:43:22 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Heyo,

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Oh, I see. To me that=E2=80=99s completely orthogonal to =E2=80=98guix de=
ploy=E2=80=99 though,
> in that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98guix deplo=
y=E2=80=99 should use the
> same code for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

Yeah, I believe it would be safe to close this once the code for 'guix
deploy' and 'guix system reconfigure' is unified. I opened this under
the impression that the two would remain separate and individual changes
would need to occur for both.

Regards,
Jakob

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0vm3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--