From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:03:06 -0500
Message-ID: <87wo87e22d.fsf__18920.8696059481$1582866310$gmane$org@gnu.org>
References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net>
 <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400>
 <87pne0q0wb.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ2-Mz=Bh6dbg7BEcH54Vc0RMRDfCOkqTJzP=cW4S2wAJg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47355)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j7Xpf-0001ne-KA
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:05:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j7Xpe-0001rA-Nx
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:05:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54563)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j7Xpe-0001r6-LX
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:05:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j7Xpe-0000Sq-Hg
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:05:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33844.B33844.15828662491713@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ2-Mz=Bh6dbg7BEcH54Vc0RMRDfCOkqTJzP=cW4S2wAJg@mail.gmail.com>
 (zimoun's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:10:15 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 14:10:15 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Well, your comment is pointing: a) that the description is badly
> written and b) the 'relevance' score is too rough.

[...]

> The real problem is not the non-obvious name (ghc-pandoc instead of
> simply pandoc) but it is: a) some descriptions are badly written and
> b) the 'relevance' scoring function is not enough "smart" to detect
> them.

Thank you for taking the time to explain this.

=2D-=20
Mike Gerwitz

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJeWJ8KAAoJEIyRe39dxRuilUYP/02KD5oQ7q5/fdh2cffwIPzU
wBxvrHvF8Jc3Z0oRhlD+E4rKtzicTjxU3Uc6dG3v+TFH4GMu9+gXhXj5Qtyhkdcf
4oDZBoQYAnZ/9rQkJg5NvHDLa8meaSOTYo2UQ+EtKheBXLumNFOI2NgQOlsPPqdq
DxUegeW89qjBw6Q39l1/cCeOemIyHFmr0YjBf046SmBbYeYwYqmeaidpBGtkyHJ7
AsXZBggZghbn7KCB8jEWVp4V9Xy2la3zMNNI/3cgTal492NqPDQI9v706lGoeoFR
kSPvMoD0JijDZ1N2sl0VenOZnaJPyCh0NsP3nXx5j/oY2De653bmdvATp6oXK2w5
U//Q/EgrKJaOgc5kc2KYCsjlM1CGrZRajo7sEFoW4zcMFZbRZ34NV0nNqWOqEtWN
GNLIjljMehWmsZnlBJqAsAjMz1CIENkv7o0zF4a8RuA4t0lvGqvEpnohHIgNq6gB
HpvBcZX8oVqjmCBK4URFXsUwf2tJlPoop5u7PIlnqoAg6CUQ3CcRoVSV2+/fvxlf
u9ZEhdwa3xXi2METFlSxNKWwij6WWljCDhup1bpofleN/8B0ZkncWEIJX2ogj6WG
ctWx+k9EdgmAgnos+gci7upH4nGLoQrpXMtbZuRWv6l6bl64damYKaT1kcNeYxVa
HEf1Z4fx79RL6E0UrRyq
=AcLV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--