* bug#53030: Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")
@ 2022-01-05 17:18 calcium via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-01-05 20:36 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: calcium via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2022-01-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 53030
The syntaxe to specify a package version and desired output
only works on guix install package@version:output
guix remove package@version:output doesn't works
guix remove package@version doesn't works
(specification->package "package@version") works
(specification->package "package:output") works
but both (specification->package "packge@version:output") doesn't work.
/etc/config.scm:line:col: Throw to key `quit' with args `(1)'.
Even though
guix package --export-manifest
;; => (specifications->manifest (list "package@version:output" "package@version"))
I tested "package@version:output" using "openjdk@11:doc"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* bug#53030: Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")
2022-01-05 17:18 bug#53030: Can't (specification->package "package@version:output") calcium via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2022-01-05 20:36 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2022-01-05 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: calcium; +Cc: 53030
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]
Calcium,
Thanks for the report!
In future, please submit separate issues separately, it helps keep
discussion, er, separate. It's easier to merge issues than to
split them.
> Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")
Short answer: it is not intended to work. Use
specification->package+output if you want outputs. This is not a
bug but a design decision. Which are not above critique, but
guix-devel@ might be a better place for that.
I've considered in the past to submit a cheeky patch silently
renaming specification->package+ouput to specification->package,
just to avoid this FAQ. It should be almost perfectly backwards
compatible in that no existing code should break with the same
input.
However I think clarity the greater value here, and did not submit
such a patch.
calcium via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
> The syntaxe to specify a package version and desired output
> only works on guix install package@version:output
>
> guix remove package@version:output doesn't works
I cannot reproduce this:
$ guix install git@2.34.0:send-email
$ guix remove git@2.34.0:send-email
$
Can you provide an example?
> guix remove package@version doesn't works
‘package@version’ means ‘package@version:out’, not (a
hypothetical) ‘package@version:*’ wildcard. It neither installs
nor removes ‘all outputs’.
I did notice that, e.g.,
$ guix install git@2:send-email
$ guix remove git@2:send-email
guix remove: error: package 'git@2:send-email' not found in
profile
$
is asymmetrical. I wonder if there are any drawbacks to making it
work.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-05 21:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-05 17:18 bug#53030: Can't (specification->package "package@version:output") calcium via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-01-05 20:36 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).