Christopher Baines writes: > Something I've noticed from data.guix.gnu.org, it fails to compute the > guix derivation for armhf-linux because texlive-bin fails to build [1] > > 1: https://data.guix.gnu.org/job/28674 > phase `check' failed after 820.9 seconds > command "make" "check" "-j" "8" failed with status 2 > builder for `/gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv' failed with exit code 1 > @ build-failed > /gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv - > 1 builder for > `/gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv' > failed with exit code 1 > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/gd3xkfbpfcv03y958ggmgnc150cz4r82-texlive-amsmath-59745.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built > error: while computing manifest entry derivation for armhf-linux > error %exception: (#<&message message: "You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/s82qcdcxsyr16fp1db8n800jd171vk4v-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed > to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > \"e9f9f291edafaa27fa6d7e9967909555a08d383e\"; system: > \"armhf-linux\";\nhost version: \"1.3.0-21.e427593\"; pull-version: > 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE output above by email to > .\n">) I forgot an important link, here's a texlive-bin derivation on data.guix.gnu.org, which links to some logs for failed builds [1]. I'm not quite sure why the derivation here doesn't match up with the derivation shown in the log above. 1: https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/vr6q02wyzjkbk35fkqcqi653csza22mw-texlive-bin-20210325.drv