> I’ve pushed the paper under the new guix/maintenance.git repository
> [0].

I've spotted some typos.

>       (p [This section describe the functional package management
> paradigm and its implementation in Nix.  It then shows how Guix differs,
> and what the rationale is.])

The word "describe" should be changed to "describes."

>       (p [Our goals when designing Guix was to provide interfaces
> ranging from Nix's low-level primitives such as ,(tt
> [derivation]) to high-level package declarations.

"Our goal" instead of "our goals."

> Input file names are similarly reified through the ,(tt [%build-inputs])
> variable (not shown here.)

Change to "variable (not shown here)."

> As an additional constraint, this extra layer should be efficient in
> space and time: package management tools need to be able to load and
> traverse a distribution consisting in thousands of packages.])

Replace "consisting in" with "consisting of."