From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#21677: [Bug-guile-ncurses] Guile-NCurses test failure when built against NCurses 6.0 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87vba4iilk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87612asnft.fsf@gnu.org> <1683863730.3263018.1444758001236.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <1933042933.1958255.1445100616496.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56101) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znl5P-0000BY-Sy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:21:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znl5L-0007QS-0y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:21:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znl5K-0007QO-TU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Znl5K-0006rM-BB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:21:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1933042933.1958255.1445100616496.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> (Mike Gran's message of "Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:50:16 +0000 (UTC)") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mike Gran Cc: "21677@debbugs.gnu.org" <21677@debbugs.gnu.org>, "bug-guile-ncurses@gnu.org" Mike Gran skribis: > Okay. I've tried some of the combinations of Guile, Ncurses and OS > and getwin/putwin is broken in different ways with different combinations. > > No one uses those functions anyway, as far as I can tell. > > I think the plan is to put out a guile-ncurses 1.7 that just eliminates > it. And then soon, put out a guile-ncurses 2.0 that will require guile-2= .0.11+ > and ncurses 6.0+, and re-evaluate whether it is worth it to fix > those functions. > > I'll try to put out guile-ncurses 1.7 this week. Great, thanks. Ludo=E2=80=99.