From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:47:40 -0600 Message-ID: <87vaukvs0j.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHcwg-0007gA-R0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:48:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHcwc-0002AC-Tq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:48:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHcwc-0002A1-RC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHcwc-0006ee-DQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:48:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Luis Felipe =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo , 25205@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Felipe! > > Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis: > >> Steps to reproduce >> ================== >> >> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html >> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button >> >> >> Unexpected behavior >> =================== >> >> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution. > > The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the “GNU > womb” project at . So in > general such reports should go to bug-womb@gnu.org. > > However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly > superseded by the other one. I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s > confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway. > :-) > > WDYT? I strongly support this.