From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#29674: Ceph creates Btrfs subvolumes on Btrfs during tests. Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:58:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87vahcvsz0.fsf@fastmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmxW-0005mv-6v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:59:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmxT-00010z-4f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:59:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmxS-00010V-To for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:59:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmxS-0002xS-GT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:59:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Rutger Helling , 29674@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rutger Helling writes: > Hey Guix, > > I was surprised to learn that Ceph creates Btrfs subvolumes during its=20 > tests. > This is problematic because on Btrfs regular users can create=20 > subvolumes, but they cannot delete them. Ugh. My build machines do not use Btrfs so I hadn't noticed. Will look into disabling these tests. Actually I'm tempted to just disable tests, since they are extremely I/O intensive and some are flaky (about a 50% success rate on Hydra). I've also been unable to update to the latest versions due to test suite changes. Maybe a system test is a decent compromise, although that will require writing service definitions for the various daemons. It's probably a better use of our time than fighting the comprehensive test suite. Do you intend to use Ceph on Guix, or is it for a dependent package? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlov/JMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqdvAgAgipIZ4B4RoLa8gjpA7w9A85g6UhoMzx0xNMWAIoRhsU5Xu6eC/G6BCRD brVw5H6HAuCfNWWPJrdHHXj78rGDymqyFTWvDhI+6u9XYx6WMLOWqw8GgOdr5I4T +UhSKCxLIvEzsccEzxJAl9f6TkJDrs9+aWRZUQvDEGoBh/pf4MGqDtreq3mbwjUx uXXn18VhXKp55lOkhCtPaPu7Z0SJYwZbo8DRO05H9N5DhRamKWp0s4T3FB6/OsU2 G6X3PXmfJ8umaYnpqLRktMZO5P/ZJj2xZAxoxfBTvAI4/k2p8RSCL7ZrQ8nDRy12 WXxenyv4E46j9bDRl31MzEuoq0Y93w== =4iRy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--