From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: bug#32539: Cuirass: a commit that updates doc will produce 86 tests Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:07:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87va7saktv.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87in3wb2zw.fsf@lassieur.org> <87r2ig6f8q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fv8dD-000517-O2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:08:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fv8dA-0008VX-F8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:08:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fv8dA-0008VQ-Ay for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:08:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fv8d8-0000M1-4u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:08:04 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87r2ig6f8q.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32539@debbugs.gnu.org Heya! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, > > Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > >> Evaluation 338[1] is triggered by commit 1d8d69c[2], which only updates >> the documentation. This evaluation produces 86 useless tests: >> test.mcron.i686-linux, test.opensmtpd.i686-linux, etc. I believe those >> tests are triggered at each evaluation (almost), and it's a considerable >> waste of resources. > > I claim that these tests are useful and that having them under CI is a > good thing! > > AFAICS the result of test.basic.*, test.mcron.*, etc. should be > unchanged when doc/*.texi are modified; if that=E2=80=99s not the case, w= e have > a bug. :-) So there=E2=80=99s no waste of resources in this case. My point is that the derivations files are different at each commit, despite the changes being only about documentation. It seems to me that documentation is not an input of the tests, therefore the inputs didn't change and the test derivations shouldn't change. > However the tests in (gnu tests install) do entail a full build of Guix > from the checkout, among other things, at every commit, so they are > expensive. They are useful though, so I=E2=80=99d rather keep it this wa= y if > our build farm can keep up. > > Thoughts? > > Ludo=E2=80=99.