From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#32715: Chromium: scrolling doesn't work after a certain amount of time Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 18:43:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87va6ow8y5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87worrnq5v.fsf@lassieur.org> <87va7bnpsc.fsf@lassieur.org> <87bm8wp7pl.fsf@fastmail.com> <87h8i89zow.fsf@lassieur.org> <20180929144254.GA16169@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ILb-0002wa-Fp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:44:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ILa-0002x7-S4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:44:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ILa-0002wy-N8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ILa-0003Q9-Gz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:44:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180929144254.GA16169@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:42:54 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 32715@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur wrote: >> PS: I'm unsure whether it makes sense to report bug for softwares that >> are considered non-free and are just packaged in channels. If it >> doesn't, I'll happily close my bugs reports. > > We don't use our official communication channels (the mailing lists and > #guix IRC channel) to recommend non-free software. But Chromium is > widely distributed under a BSD license, so I think we should consider it > free. Guix goes beyond software freedom by following the FSDG [0], and > the Chromium varant being discussed is specifically intended to comply > with the FSDG. > > In general, we don't need to handle bug reports for packages in external > channels. In this case, we are working to bring the package into GNU > Guix, so it's appropriate to report issues here, in my opinion. Agreed on all points. Ludo=E2=80=99.