From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
To: "Gábor Boskovits" <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: 22533-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22533: Python bytecode reproducibility
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 22:22:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87va20wos0.fsf@elephly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sgxvtl19.fsf@elephly.net>
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> Now that we’re using Python 3.7 and this version supports hash-based pyc
> files, is this still an issue? Do we need to do anything to enable
> hash-based pyc compilation?
>
> See:
> https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.7.html#pep-552-hash-based-pyc-files
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/
It looks like this is no longer a problem. I built borg just now and
the pyc files are reproducible.
(The man pages include a date stamp, though, which I’m trying to patch
now.)
--
Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-03 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 5:15 bug#22533: Non-determinism in python-3 ".pyc" bytecode Leo Famulari
2016-02-02 8:54 ` Leo Famulari
2016-02-02 20:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-02-04 23:17 ` Leo Famulari
2016-03-29 23:11 ` Cyril Roelandt
2016-03-29 23:13 ` Cyril Roelandt
2016-04-06 8:29 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-05-26 13:41 ` bug#22533: Python bytecode reproducibility Marius Bakke
2018-03-03 22:37 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-04 9:21 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-03-04 12:46 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-04 15:30 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-03-04 19:18 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-05 0:02 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-05 0:05 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-05 15:36 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-03-05 20:33 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-03-05 21:46 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-05 22:02 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-05 22:06 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-05 23:21 ` Marius Bakke
2018-03-06 13:28 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-06 14:43 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-03-06 14:57 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-03-08 10:39 ` Gábor Boskovits
2019-01-14 13:40 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-02-03 21:22 ` Ricardo Wurmus [this message]
2019-02-04 22:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-03-05 9:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87va20wos0.fsf@elephly.net \
--to=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=22533-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=boskovits@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).