From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#40073: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9n5ls8o.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jDSLD-0008UO-QT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 08:26:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jDSLC-0001WB-Kx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 08:26:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jDSLC-0001Vp-I8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 08:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jDSLC-0002hL-EH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 08:26:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jDSL4-0008QN-PJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 08:25:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jDSL3-0000we-EW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 08:25:54 -0400 List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 40073@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that has the wrong checksum. Starting download of /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svm= l-VF.patch From=20https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recip= es/D47188-svml-VF.patch... downloading from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/c= onda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch... D47188-svml-VF.patch 73KiB 1.5MiB/s 00:00 [##= ################] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188= -svml-VF.patch: expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr actual hash: 0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D= 47188-svml-VF.patch' build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.d= rv failed This is likely a regression from 6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum. I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8. There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the patches. Not sure what to do from here, help wanted! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5uHscACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPr8JAgApC55khsAE4azjB5peZYnXH/+p+WFAZditPETzgULZju4AmMcQxA+sB8f 9Ja6s2hZW0FHm7PK9LfA6sF3KKGU/CHKGplXj9KIz8lpJiAw5I8bSDLNjM2TfdLU sp/K7MG6vS9wXkip8aLfQU7jeoh4mhl7+SQqeuEuUBQUWbgq11q+d3+86SmjP6P0 ZpeQPSEX5luPwuGsFiFwpdK/KpIgnGJEbcH39S8CrDAHK/iT/oEM/SBZa1VV6CQI kR9WH2klJ9UHeTISnJpbq2YAqBVQM4McPERO3VZ6jF1xSXeQ9zSwsd6aOCeAePyg No1t/18VH6awCRG/t9gNhrGJtLWH7w== =xelU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--