unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 43893@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43893: [PATCH v3] maint: update-guix-package: Prevent accidentally breaking guix pull.
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:36:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9f44852.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfg0bo9m.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:06:45 +0200")

Hello Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>  (define (main . args)
>>    (match args
>>      ((commit version)
>> -     (with-store store
>> -       (let* ((source   (add-to-store store
>> -                                      "guix-checkout" ;dummy name
>> -                                      #t "sha256" %top-srcdir
>> -                                      #:select? version-controlled?))
>> -              (hash     (query-path-hash store source))
>> +     (with-directory-excursion %top-srcdir
>> +       (or (getenv "GUIX_ALLOW_ME_TO_USE_PRIVATE_COMMIT")
>> +           (commit-already-pushed? (find-origin-remote) commit)
>> +           (leave (G_ "Commit ~a is not pushed upstream.  Aborting.~%") commit))
>> +       (let* ((hash (with-temporary-git-worktree commit
>> +                        (nix-base32-string->bytevector
>> +                         (string-trim-both
>> +                          (with-output-to-string
>> +		            (lambda ()
>> +		              (guix-hash "-rx" ".")))))))
>>                (location (package-definition-location))
>>                (old-hash (content-hash-value
>> -                          (origin-hash (package-source guix)))))
>> +                         (origin-hash (package-source guix)))))
>>           (edit-expression location
>>                            (update-definition commit hash
>>                                               #:old-hash old-hash
>> -                                             #:version version))
>> -
>> -         ;; Re-add SOURCE to the store, but this time under the real name used
>> -         ;; in the 'origin'.  This allows us to build the package without
>> -         ;; having to make a real checkout; thus, it also works when working
>> -         ;; on a private branch.
>> -         (reload-module
>> -          (resolve-module '(gnu packages package-management)))
>> -
>> -         (let* ((source (add-to-store store
>> -                                      (origin-file-name (package-source guix))
>> -                                      #t "sha256" source))
>> -                (root   (store-path-package-name source)))
>> -
>> -           ;; Add an indirect GC root for SOURCE in the current directory.
>> -           (false-if-exception (delete-file root))
>> -           (symlink source root)
>> -           (add-indirect-root store
>> -                              (string-append (getcwd) "/" root))
>> -
>> -           (format #t "source code for commit ~a: ~a (GC root: ~a)~%"
>> -                   commit source root)))))
>
> I realize it was maybe enough to wrap this whole portion (starting from
> “Re-add SOURCE”) in (unless (getenv
> "GUIX_ALLOW_ME_TO_USE_PRIVATE_COMMIT") …)?  Running ‘guix build guix’
> would have forced the source derivation to be built.
>
> Anyhow, thanks for working on it!

Sorry, I'm a bit lost.  Are you suggesting that we should restore the
code following the ;; Re-add SOURCE [...], but wrapped with unless to
make it conditional to GUIX_ALLOW_ME_TO_USE_PRIVATE_COMMIT being
defined?  That part depends on SOURCE, a store file name, which we don't
have anymore since we no longer add the sources to the store to compute
the hash.

We could add the sources to the store from the clean checkout, but I
thought one great thing about the patch was that it removed interactions
with the store, allowing for the source derivations to happen normally
when testing with 'guix build guix' (previously you'd have had to 'guix
build guix --check', as the store had silently been pre-populated with
the sources).  I see value in using the usual mechanism to get the
source rather than a side-channel, optimization hack, as it will help
ensuring correctness.

Perhaps I misunderstood your point?

Thank you,

Maxim




  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-21  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09 21:58 bug#43893: make update-guix-package produced an incorrect hash Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-10  0:04 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-10  5:08   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-10  5:08 ` bug#43893: [PATCH] maint: update-guix-package: Ensure sources are clean Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-10 11:59   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-11  2:35     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-10 20:08   ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-10 21:14     ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-12  4:40       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-12  9:40       ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-12 14:18         ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-11 19:43     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-12  9:43       ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-13  1:33         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-11 19:57 ` bug#43893: [PATCH v2] maint: update-guix-package: Prevent accidentally breaking guix pull Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-13 16:00   ` Marius Bakke
2020-10-14  3:17     ` bug#43893: [PATCH v3] " Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-20 21:06       ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-21  2:36         ` Maxim Cournoyer [this message]
2020-10-21  8:53           ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-23  4:38             ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-23 15:01               ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-25  4:32                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-25 14:50                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-25 15:29                     ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-31  3:56                       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-31 10:42                         ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-11-09 19:28                           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-11-09 22:03                             ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-11-10 14:31                               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-11-09 19:29                           ` bug#43893: [PATCH] maint: update-guix-package: Optionally add sources to store Maxim Cournoyer
2020-11-09 22:18                             ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-11-10 14:02                               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-11-10 14:48                                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-11-10 15:18                                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-11-09 22:44                           ` bug#43893: [PATCH v5] " Maxim Cournoyer
2020-11-10  9:32                             ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-25 14:41       ` bug#43893: [PATCH v3] maint: update-guix-package: Prevent accidentally breaking guix pull Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-25 19:17         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-14  4:10     ` bug#43893: [PATCH v2] " Maxim Cournoyer
2020-10-19 18:04       ` Maxim Cournoyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v9f44852.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=43893@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).