From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oD6aJ7vnsV+8OQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:45:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id cKeNI7vnsV+QIgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:45:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4CE9403E6 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36310 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keUW1-00065c-DQ for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:45:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keUVq-00065R-NP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:45:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keUVq-0002TE-DJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:45:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keUVq-0007zb-B2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44383: gst-plugins-good fails its test suite on armhf-linux Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44383 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Marius Bakke Received: via spool by 44383-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44383.160549469730697 (code B ref 44383); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 44383) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2020 02:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keUVl-0007z2-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:44:57 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com ([209.85.222.170]:32864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keUVi-0007yo-Qj for 44383@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:44:56 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id l2so15591615qkf.0 for <44383@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:44:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=SrL//QFTiK2vTBexi7HSQCgpfpIR3Rp7Y9uiepH5KXk=; b=eZVCWn1Y1vWPUULOGV6gMR/m90hG+QbBMDYfP7lWWPTXCO3vBWpxCLUx4eELVXtUbs 7kJqRFFsre8HOAv908FkWphKD/ADE7Iugt4gjWLXn2tvgPdzvx2aihgVmVIsoeedRElc k043Z0yeUk+5QR7NqSoJXRMcky7RuBBYQThaSHkBYqnoAwYkRfE56ezzJeY152FDr16k cYRrrgWQyvcn3N8O9eB500sbEQzyjTcqPxDlPnhdEyBAY76WEj22gFyhJhPTWJPISTMm nGZ5SVROJJfHxMIjYh/Vg++1x0SYxXH6x/x2fxndOrpVOlZaHESE96tfut3VZsAZVnmZ JVug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=SrL//QFTiK2vTBexi7HSQCgpfpIR3Rp7Y9uiepH5KXk=; b=kIBQ790ClUtetKl33sViudibOsL/FIGSqjiHHt5E7VsW++qPN9nIRv4N6zLMM6bsji /YyEntrpcVoOorhMb6OTyesdsImNHBLkaeS5eU0SJeT+j0QFdZIxvrMDVhDwhjAuz2gk kpX4kF1W2+e7F1Wz7wAuCbZwmaE9sWMTXeoT0wJQx5NoeZVOd2KzWMCiTT5CJ6/Yu5/N i37QLSY6dD/VnrPxJa1zBbBaLPXK9tWDgmMcRBSjItl+Nrbrh7+sprUzQUqDz3/VR+h2 /QAUu1NHUJ9wkL5qIEXDmKJdcL2l9+HQLvb61L5MFnfKB92z5XJdaTITqAPnGXhsMTcX AXkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530cauyJQYOVxUhqK03Tng7w8MYsykAJ1pBX6AFN8IcfE/7n5ewi W85w+tfFlOYzLS2Pb0nsAQBlsORZGvg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1efD6vcJiKIBOhffr1fYTKH89SDQJo5k2Fbs95sL9ozYgNjNiYULGtfpJZaPKxH6D23lpgA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:6307:: with SMTP id x7mr12545324qkb.195.1605494689085; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-128-91.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.128.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v126sm11670937qkc.104.2020.11.15.18.44.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:44:48 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87sg9szar5.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0utdn0t.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:44:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k0utdn0t.fsf@gnu.org> (Marius Bakke's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:34:10 +0100") Message-ID: <87v9e6dnq8.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44383@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eZVCWn1Y; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: FwuxRHONDhF2 Hello Marius, Marius Bakke writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Here's the output for the failing tests: > > This is using QEMU transparent emulation, right? Yes. > There is a substitute on Berlin: > > $ guix weather -s armhf-linux gst-plugins-good > computing 1 package derivations for armhf-linux... > looking for 1 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org... > updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > https://ci.guix.gnu.org > 100.0% substitutes available (1 out of 1) > at least 4.1 MiB of nars (compressed) > 5.5 MiB on disk (uncompressed) > 1.402 seconds per request (1.4 seconds in total) > 0.7 requests per second > > I'm not sure to what extent we should patch packages to work with QEMU > transparent emulation. And currently the CI does not use it at all for > 32-bit ARM (albeit for rather different reasons). Do we have reasons to believe the QEMU user-mode emulation is not reliable/accurate? That'd be a bummer. I haven't seen any disclaimer in QEMU's documentation ? Thanks, Maxim