* bug#56091: Possible hash mismatch in barrier 2.4.0
@ 2022-06-19 6:25 Vishakh Kumar
2022-06-19 15:28 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vishakh Kumar @ 2022-06-19 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 56091
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1712 bytes --]
Hey there!
Am trying to install barrier on my computer and guix tells me
there is a
hash mismatch. I’m able to install other applications, and I think
this
is a case where the hash in the package description might be
wrong?
More than happy to provide more info, please let me know how i can
help
debug this.
Cheers,
Vishakh Kumar
> grokkingstuff@grokkingNoether ~$ guix install barrier
> The following package will be installed:
> barrier 2.4.0
>
> The following derivations will be built:
> /gnu/store/0lwma8nhhy18z8x5v8zjjhk740bm1mv9-barrier-2.4.0.drv
> /gnu/store/lba0pd5a1hzzfbcswgx0ws1nrldfxxnp-barrier-2.4.0-checkout.drv
>
> 15.1 MB will be downloaded
> qtbase-5.15.2 14.4MiB 31KiB/s 07:54
> [##################] 100.0%
> building
> /gnu/store/lba0pd5a1hzzfbcswgx0ws1nrldfxxnp-barrier-2.4.0-checkout.drv…
> /r:sha256 hash mismatch for
> /gnu/store/s7ivxx684bd34bzmgdc282kw1lsg407r-barrier-2.4.0-checkout:
> expected hash:
> 10xk9szxxnqgfym53mcd9hqj1cw2ipncmiixw3i3ajlj1vn88qh1
> actual hash:
> 19bwa9qidq2mxv1fkyxxc1xdmv3jx6bj35bkaaw70jzkblnfmlfs
> hash mismatch for store item
> ’/gnu/store/s7ivxx684bd34bzmgdc282kw1lsg407r-barrier-2.4.0-checkout’
> build of
> /gnu/store/lba0pd5a1hzzfbcswgx0ws1nrldfxxnp-barrier-2.4.0-checkout.drv
> failed
> View build log at
> ’/var/log/guix/drvs/lb/a0pd5a1hzzfbcswgx0ws1nrldfxxnp-barrier-2.4.0-checkout.drv.bz2’.
> cannot build derivation
> `/gnu/store/0lwma8nhhy18z8x5v8zjjhk740bm1mv9-barrier-2.4.0.drv’:
> 1 dependencies couldn’t be built
> guix install: error: build of
> `/gnu/store/0lwma8nhhy18z8x5v8zjjhk740bm1mv9-barrier-2.4.0.drv’
> failed
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3302 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* bug#56091: Possible hash mismatch in barrier 2.4.0
2022-06-19 6:25 bug#56091: Possible hash mismatch in barrier 2.4.0 Vishakh Kumar
@ 2022-06-19 15:28 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2022-06-19 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vishakh Kumar; +Cc: 56091, 56091-done
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]
Hi!
Thanks for reporting this.
Vishakh Kumar 写道:
> I think this is a case where the hash in the package description
> might be wrong?
What usually (though, mercifully, rarely) happens is that the hash
is correct at the time of packaging, then upstream goes and moves
a perfectly good git tag instead of making a new one, and the hash
becomes wrong in retrospect.
This case was different: the original packager correctly ran ‘guix
hash -rx .’ on their clone of the barrier git repository, but did
not first check out the submodules and was unaware that these
affect the hash. I don't think the original package ever built,
or at least fail to see how it could have.
Fixed on master[0].
Closing, but could you guix pull & confirm that it works for you?
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=7f1cb1ebca169e3a4b5ed59fe226bb614b18b57f
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-19 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-19 6:25 bug#56091: Possible hash mismatch in barrier 2.4.0 Vishakh Kumar
2022-06-19 15:28 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).