From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
Cc: 64858@debbugs.gnu.org,
"Pierre-Henry Fröhring" <phfrohring@deeplinks.com>
Subject: bug#64858: ~guix shell -C -f guix.scm …~ should not always need ~--rebuild-cache~ option to build the expected environment.
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 23:59:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v89tgzsz.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b178dff2dec09ca8af96fae54d5519c6d1cf1a4.1700457155.git.felix.lechner@lease-up.com> (Felix Lechner's message of "Sun, 19 Nov 2023 21:12:36 -0800")
Hi Felix,
Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> skribis:
> --- a/guix/scripts/shell.scm
> +++ b/guix/scripts/shell.scm
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ (define (key->file key)
> (values #f #f)))
> ((('nesting? . #t) . rest)
> (loop rest system file (append specs '("nested guix"))))
> - ((('load . ('package candidate)) . rest)
> + ((('load . ('ad-hoc-package candidate)) . rest)
> (if (and (not file) (null? specs))
> (loop rest system candidate specs)
> (values #f #f)))
Oooh. So there were really two bugs:
1. The one you describe Felix, where ‘guix shell -f guix.scm’ would
cache things in a nonsensical way (as if you had just run ‘guix
shell’ with no arguments and no ‘guix.scm’ or ‘manifest.scm’ files
in $PWD).
2. The use case issue that I understood from Pierre-Henry’s report,
which is that ‘guix shell -f guix.scm’ shouldn’t have any caching
in the first place.
I fixed it with these two commits (the first one is almost what you
proposed, Felix):
5283d24062 shell: Disable caching for ‘guix shell -f guix.scm’.
762be40098 shell: Correct cache key for ‘guix shell -f guix.scm’.
It seems to do the right thing now. Let me know what you think!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 14:01 bug#64858: ~guix shell -C -f guix.scm …~ should not always need ~--rebuild-cache~ option to build the expected environment Pierre-Henry Fröhring
2023-10-12 15:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-11-20 5:12 ` bug#64858: [PATCH] In 'guix shell', discard ad-hoc profile when 'guix.scm' file is newer. (Closes: #64858) Felix Lechner via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-11-22 22:59 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2023-11-23 0:38 ` bug#64858: ~guix shell -C -f guix.scm …~ should not always need ~--rebuild-cache~ option to build the expected environment Felix Lechner via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-11-26 4:17 ` Felix Lechner via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v89tgzsz.fsf_-_@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=64858@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=felix.lechner@lease-up.com \
--cc=phfrohring@deeplinks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).