From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#19979: vlc install failed with backtrace Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 18:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87twy2t16z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ioeime0k.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4necb5k.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42757) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSr43-0005px-Ug for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:57:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSr42-0002LI-UM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:57:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSr42-0002LC-Qq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YSr42-0005lK-A0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:57:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87y4necb5k.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:12:55 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 19979@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Axel skribis: >> >>> and guix crashed with trace: >>> >>> Backtrace: > [...] >>> I just installed guixsd 0.8 and updated it with `guix pull`. Other >>> packages installed without problems. >> >> I cannot reproduce it now just after running =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99. >> >> However, the line numbers above do not seem to correspond to current >> Guix. Could it be that =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 was run under one ac= count, and =E2=80=98guix >> package=E2=80=99 under a different account? > > I don't know if this is relevant, but did you notice that he "just > installed guixsd 0.8", i.e. not the latest (0.8.1) release? I did, but since Axel said they run =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D, it shouldn= =E2=80=99t matter. Ludo=E2=80=99.