From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#26604: documentation: pdf generation is broken Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:14:56 -0700 Message-ID: <87tw5fu5dr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20170422110947.pyepomrq4s3zzntr@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d28wR-0005BN-EK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:16:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d28wM-00017I-Gf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:16:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d28wM-000179-69 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d28wL-0001RA-RQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:16:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170422110947.pyepomrq4s3zzntr@abyayala> (ng0's message of "Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:09:47 +0000") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: ng0 Cc: 26604@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 writes: > As long as I run guix I was never able to build the documentation > as pdf. What's wrong with it? > > [user@abyayala ~/src/guix/guix]$ make doc/guix.pdf > TEXI2PDF doc/guix.pdf > /gnu/store/jz7jq4w8d4czvgnk9as07rrdbcfjjgjj-profile/bin/texi2dvi: pdfte= x exited with bad status, quitting. > make: *** [Makefile:3591: doc/guix.pdf] Error 1 I looked into this a week or two ago. I think we're waiting for a newer release of automake? Perhaps John Darrington knows more. See this email thread, which I found at the time and seems to contain the relevant information: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg01074.html =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlj8KkAACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp1dYA//aF7tvVpKXCJbGouY1piZlocSlgnphduWjmcqmYmAVBtOvhwr+iNPw511 4+3iO9g/HW9TEw4aIelJmkm3yyQuEyr78a0SiSAmREEs5CQ8GEeO3ZAtFABzYLzj pX1JQ0uJ4rGUHWHdl+eSAfwZQX7YUV8K8uH1F6/PcbUOdPp0j7SKa89cBfpvhPag MtNqP1xlA3vwo7T2/WY2jNp0gJKIxpaAD0XCY4kKNpelTpn2jNB+ZMC+r6mc2Svv w8x+hTkqbP5fZNoq8YvB4e1vn4m9B4+qYM3jhJ71Tzw4jz3t7mnsDoXHOmkhZwD4 rRAXi+H5IKrQma5msCTrr/4FyZ3R5yEfMkDvkIHDfbAsRg5yHJwS/hvqKHSuoJow e7DfgQ6nLnB92a/Qg9SA87CgFBd5ggLhyfgDgBwGxxPQMLm9m/OCVQJFPAoOjT6N HpTm0T/p6bODasXDxC/4UuYt+t5pmgrMcbkGNKNS28sJglV38ZEO/j0AtOc7x6NQ 0Y7hKOJRKAGevHYst9QAghTHkl7yElm5+exsHHa3lnVnYArNVnx8iKp8GQa4UFf3 EsURtdV13ALSWLUYIT5oq8IkajfJPuEu3gPNvYVlVif2cpTbSIfIvj4Cj6o9GDTY uO9oF2NWD7E+fVKLuMMJ3zVI3ViNY5d3Q6Tb0tL2pXmgquONAnE= =VsHm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--