From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#32840: linux-libre 4.18.9: shpchp is no longer a module (now: built-in) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:21:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87tvmc6ap2.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20180925195720.nelxr55dy7ntupma@abyayala> <87lg7pgcva.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g53NS-00088r-0R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:32:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g53D0-00050x-Ip for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:22:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g53D0-00050t-D9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g53D0-0002X7-9E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:22:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87lg7pgcva.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 32840-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Nils Gillmann Mark H Weaver writes: > Nils Gillmann writes: > >> at taler we need shpchp as a module in the initrd. >> >> Before version 4.18.x, shpchp was a module we've build in guix' linux-li= bre, >> you were able to just specify it for the initrd. >> >> With 4.18.9, this module became a compile-in/built-in (see linux >> commit log). I want to avoid maintaining yet another kernel >> definition for future complications if I can. Can we get this module >> built in by default? > > Done in commit fe73352e8073ea0a0e6f6b5591f24395671998ab on master. > Closing this bug now, but please reopen if appropriate. I don=E2=80=99t understand why building it as a module is needed when upstr= eam decided to turn it into a built-in feature. Could you please explain? --=20 Ricardo