From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#32952: "make check-system" fails to report record-abi-mismatch-error Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:18:18 -0700 Message-ID: <87tvl7w64l.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875zyfv8y7.fsf@gmail.com> <87woqsziod.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGU71-0004G4-Jy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:19:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGU6w-0005Vf-4N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:19:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGU6w-0005VW-0d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:19:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gGU6v-0006xJ-OT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:19:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87woqsziod.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:12:18 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32952@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Commit de5cbd4a38a33e0412f1c481fe8e01a871dc13e5 changed the arguments > passed along =E2=80=98record-abi-mismatch-error=E2=80=99 exceptions preci= sely to fix the > problem you report I believe. :-) > > What=E2=80=99s probably happening here is that you have a .go file built = before > this commit, which is why it=E2=80=99s passing only on argument (the reco= rd > type) along the =E2=80=98record-abi-mismatch-error=E2=80=99 exception. > > Does that make sense? Yes, this makes sense! You were right: this was the problem. I forgot about this bug report, but I can confirm that it is now resolved. Thank you for closing it, and for your help! =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlvUufoACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp1Bdg//d62tK2F+XZhq/MLp9vHX3n1eRFs9MueSfu4FIQbzckxOxdWuA1BT3PB3 cua6gSAMS2H5okbY58ecPVXahSW0XTIyVicud73+3mkYZzlu5p+4rd643g9e9WB5 GpSS942aOFLpuLufA+Wmq7UlhHa1uFvvDnNq6n/pa6AMNB6XgHPtlcZ/TsBWi/59 11LEY2uNWLeIHCPXxlEmq456Z0zomLY+YYY+aFnCqvtQHEpv6eYnATG89JacqSfI /aNb4hEi0F3lesxY+rjFZ091M/scP7Q7RU81IMsHATuQwbKwVlr/yMGqeYISpNI/ Ohguon76sLccWxwDhGXO3rYTE63/BvyeNUfF3MB8tOzdI+Lf974xYzxL0jm09ZSq mDyi4NMWYrGmh4Uq2ZJFFfty3wLTQ+Wfy/u8TTlwB57qY8tnXckrO2m2olOB5ZCe 5Pa2vh0tAEaYlJbm2eXfbriV8dc5G2j8PHWBX6mvhSkQrASoIEJHpo+FUKYde9o1 e3K6V3k+vtRoF68O/cH9Jg38nh7tGE0tBAe7T1VvNZZYdosNtATAhkVQlROcVASP THsBoiMlPnx1BHuPvmI2M29gMgO8/hlg2ik2emcll9iKXHe8PChP5Klth7aRVfgc D841dfmsAmEct6Iqeg3roYIeTAKpF7tpA+kYoi9BcEf3/BQ8HzY= =qhNw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--