Hi ison, Thanks for opening a new ticket for tracking this. ison writes: > Continuing this issue from https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36878 > > guix reconfigure recently broke GRUB for me. When rebooting I get > dropped to a "grub rescue>" shell with an error about > "grub_file_filters" being an unknown symbol. > If I try doing the usual commands to tell GRUB how to boot I just > see the above error repeated, or "unknown command" when I run > things such as insmod or "configfile". > > So to fix the problem I can boot to a Guix install disk and do > "guix init" which rebuilds the system using older package > definitions from the disk. > That allows me to get a working system, but if I do another > "guix pull" and reconfigure using the same config file it breaks > GRUB again when I reboot. "guix describe" shows that my latest > attempt was with commit 35600cd. > > Here is the bootloader and filesystem sections of my config: > (bootloader (bootloader-configuration > (bootloader grub-efi-bootloader) > (target "/boot/efi"))) > (file-systems (cons* (file-system > (device "/dev/sda2") > (mount-point "/boot/efi") > (type "vfat")) > (file-system > (device (file-system-label "guixsd-root")) > (mount-point "/") > (type "ext4")) > %base-file-systems)) This narrows it down quite a bit -- I suspect that we're broken for 'grub-efi-bootloader', since I've been able to successfully reconfigure with 'grub-bootloader' on both of my machines. > I should make a note that I usually don't use efi, and I'm not > completely confident it's all set up properly. I do have a > "BIOS boot" partition on /dev/sda1 too, is that even needed with > efi? I don't believe so. I think the ESP partition on /dev/sda2 is all you need. > Although, I have been using this setup, and the above > definitions, for about 6 months now without any bootloader or > filesystem issues. And the same config is being used to fix the > system when GRUB breaks as well as to reconfigure afterward > (causing the breakage). So my guess is some new update is the > culprit. It certainly sounds like it, and I'm the last person to have touched the bootloader installation code :) I'll look into this ASAP. Thanks again for the bug report! Regards, Jakob