From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#37423: Changing the login service from GDM to SLiM and then back to GDM causes a really bad loop Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87tv96oeri.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190916005154.41b74430@interia.pl> <871rwf5y49.fsf@ngyro.com> <87ftksvv4e.fsf@gnu.org> <875zlntiec.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgort7z0.fsf@ngyro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iBQBD-00046t-Kv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:11:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iBQBC-0004Tc-Ld for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:11:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iBQBC-0004TR-IL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iBQBC-0000a2-CC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:11:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87sgort7z0.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:25:55 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Timothy Sample Cc: 37423-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Timothy Sample skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hi G=C3=A1bor, >> >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: >> >>> Couldn't we simply do what the fix does: ensuring the owner of >>> the files under =E2=80=9C/var/lib/gdm=E2=80=9D is the current =E2=80=9C= gdm=E2=80=9D user? >> >> Hey you=E2=80=99re right, I was not approaching it from the right angle. >> >> Here=E2=80=99s a patch that does that. Thoughts? > > LGTM! Though I don=E2=80=99t have a chance to test it at the moment, so = all I > can really say is that it makes sense and I didn=E2=80=99t see any typos.= :) I tested in a VM and it=E2=80=99s all good. Pushed as f817901ee74fbc2f3c3322d473ad4c72b052499c. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.