From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#37309: [PATCH] services: openssh: Restrict to IPv4. Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:47:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87tv68m8ki.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ef0u2867.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <180aa2dee4e1da7fe915c85b90b1f60edd04f23d.1575403967.git.leo@famulari.name> <9AF0F57B-ED38-4A4F-9D34-B0A083DBBB3C@lepiller.eu> <20191204134135.GA7375@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieigA-0006L9-EP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:48:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieig8-0005eu-GR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:48:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieig6-0005e0-0h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieig5-0000R8-Vg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:48:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20191204134135.GA7375@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:41:35 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 37309@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Leo, Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:53:11PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote: >> Le 3 d=C3=A9cembre 2019 21:12:51 GMT+01:00, Leo Famulari a =C3=A9crit : >> >+@item @code{address-family} (default: @code{'inet}) >> >+This is a symbol specifying which type of internet addresses should be >> >+handled by @command{sshd}. The options are @code{inet} (IPv4), >> >+@code{inet6} (IPv6), or @code{any}, which selects both @code{inet} and >> >+@code{inet6}. The upstream default in @code{any}. However, we >> default *is* > > Thanks! > > This patch did make sshd work for me again. > > However, as part of trying to debug this issue, I changed my system > configuration so that it uses dhcp-client-service and > wpa-supplicant-service instead of using Wicd. And now I can't reproduce > the bug anymore. > > I guess that either 1) wpa_supplicant brings the network interfaces up > faster or 2) the state of the network interfaces is more accurately > captured with these services (in the sense of, is the network up?). Did anyone manage to get an strace log as was discussed in ? That would allow us to know where this is hanging exactly (probably bind(2) on an IPv6 address.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.