From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#38715: Issue with guile-email: unbound variable Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:03:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87tv5monve.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87eewvpw2h.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <87a77jp2yj.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <874kxns726.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZMZ-00016L-NP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:04:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZMY-0006yQ-OV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:04:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZMY-0006yG-GG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:04:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZMY-0004Wc-Bj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:04:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <874kxns726.fsf@cbaines.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Christopher Baines Cc: jlicht@fsfe.org, 38715@debbugs.gnu.org Christopher Baines writes: >> Could it be that the reference to guile-email in the version field of >> mumimu created this issue? >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> (version (git-version (package-version guile-email) revision commit)) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I also spotted this. It looks to me sort of like a copy/paste error, I'm > not sure why this variant of mu would take the version of the > guile-email package. This is a copy/paste error. The origin of this expression is the guix.scm file of mumi. Ludo then wrote a mumi service and copied the definition of mumimu from that guix.scm file. (package-version guile-email) is obviously wrong. It should have been (package-version mu), because mumimu is a fork of mu. -- Ricardo