From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:51:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87tv3tgtv2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv3ticcx.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1yxe1z7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bNz-0005Cw-KH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:52:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bNy-0002Op-KU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:52:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bNy-0002OL-HA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bNy-0008Sm-GN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:52:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87r1yxe1z7.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:24:12 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > What about > > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main= /h/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2 Good idea. > So, this now becomes the recipe > > wget -O harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2 https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/de= bian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main/h/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2 > guix download $PWD/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2 > guix time-machine --commit=3D56e95d54d209c2428f970d65d9b27ae4168449ad= --no-offload -- help > > that i'm trying now, and for now it looks fine (lots of stuff to build, > i'll report success or failure when it's done). OK! > It seems, however, that for offload builds to work the guix download > needs to be repeated on the offload build farm machines too? No, I don=E2=80=99t think so, because the head node copies all the inputs to build machines before it actually offloads the build. Ludo=E2=80=99.