Hi Mark,

Mark H Weaver writes:

> Hi Pierre,
>
> Your new patch looks good to me, but the node-10.22 source field could
> be simplified to avoid repeating the unchanged field (especially the
> snippet), by inheriting from (package-source node) like this:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>     (source (origin
>               (inherit (package-source node))
>               (uri (string-append "https://nodejs.org/dist/v" version
>                                   "/node-v" version ".tar.xz"))
>               (sha256
>                (base32
>                 "1nz18fa550li10r0kzsm28c2rvvq61nq8bqdygip0rmvbi2paxg0"))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Oh yeah, that's much better.

>
> Also, it would be great to find a way to fit in the subject line that
> 10.22 is also being kept as a separate binding, especially since "guix
> build node" and most other user commands will still build 10.22.  Maybe
> something like this:
>
>   gnu: node: Downgrade to 10.20.0; add separate 'node-10.22' binding.
>
> What do you think?

Actually, even better, I can split this into two separate commits.

>
> Anyway, feel free to push this, preferably after incorporating these
> suggestions.  If I'm not mistaken, the simplification suggested above
> should not change the .drv file, and therefore not entail a rebuild, so
> testing it should be very quick.

Pushed as 6b7cba0fa897e97b43e76612e3736429426f4d9d and
92db0d39e2aa64be390e86172bd670d98e121c4b, thanks for the review!

Pierre