From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id wI2KO5/Z22NLlwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:41:20 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id qFWUO5/Z22NczgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:41:19 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8906611740 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 16:41:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbhx-0004gH-0r; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:41:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbhu-0004fp-Oz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:41:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbhu-0001g4-HF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:41:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbhu-0006KJ-Cp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#53258: Python unable to find modules within a Singularity container created with guix pack Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 15:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53258 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Josselin Poiret Cc: 53258@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Marek =?UTF-8?Q?Fel=C5=A1=C3=B6ci?= Received: via spool by 53258-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53258.167535245824302 (code B ref 53258); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 15:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 53258) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2023 15:40:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35535 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbhq-0006Ju-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:40:58 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-f181.google.com ([209.85.128.181]:37399) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbho-0006Jh-8A for 53258@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:40:56 -0500 Received: by mail-yw1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-523e3a0300eso9213207b3.4 for <53258@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:40:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YyYZdqCN2Z6Cx7Pl4+QsrAoLNuG7+iqlKX5I6rZs74U=; b=cgRxowXBQM/5HhJs8CHzmqoncTERfQ76cEBe4fcgPG3CTxGsAmz4Tp5jMQgAoAmo/9 07+D05HlMfrZ+9dZI4reje+TPE/kvOJGnovH9ifA4FF6+9qvLsuW1qib0iQRIBtS7fzy gNzA6ZC3L0UTjOCpnzN3TiLZmotf1zFyNxSy5hxaDeZv0RHYMPzr7Gma0UWCtn0qBzPM P+dlIp8nmAneN+teCUD3YpRHtTlZZ6/Grd8HI+iv6TTypywgyqgYwFExtinQfOqu3f+w zcTrqHeGYNheofY3bgK71A+E6XZU+zciUYqvOR2cN1+q2pPm6NOyPfZrDKzrAgx1CEq2 EKww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YyYZdqCN2Z6Cx7Pl4+QsrAoLNuG7+iqlKX5I6rZs74U=; b=KvZ97zpicKSJtcpILREGAhFXCC4SMzbGb1DxIvJyN/QAbtdtne7Bd1Y6fzWBIjHbl3 GltzH5LXVg+Unk0o3XTly+PkUTspg1Xmw86unDHwwx+y/kXfps7XxQ1wUkMFzkhoEMR1 5zv4DIHGkYaNRyxRljI+0Rw0b2Hlr5rB6uTjHX/PaMxe/kMLCEeNK5rsm1/vNQvGhVXS IHkhH6yIANfQx6ClY1N3cpNi7jC3PclPqCAtO2oRIu1H04kBSDxZj826znnQBIFM1OdK /G0rtpHbtFwv8xB4Wb/c6uFxdGZgbkrJ9UgfODjvom+2lh2Zh6VRSnSQoRb6tSQ8tn2W Gb7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU9ntatMV31HorfJiAXVmTGaApHxsgoFNMxaYQLK6l5/r2fsr3d XCXb2uO3S7QTgAI/5DdwvsspbjtozvpMLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8f4V5/Er1/UiYQ010lErSKd2JzD/syXD5jZAjj+khlMlNS1Ak/CeMeheitV/C7z9K1PXFH8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:fb04:0:b0:4fe:eda8:cb25 with SMTP id l4-20020a0dfb04000000b004feeda8cb25mr4151721ywf.6.1675352450518; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:40:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd ([2607:fad8:4:3::1000]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dm35-20020a05620a1d6300b00721299cfffesm7303534qkb.39.2023.02.02.07.40.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:40:49 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <67e7d225-f824-b691-7125-6b37abef8bb0@felsoci.sk> <87wnj22ouh.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8xumk41.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8xt3q3s.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <877d9641ab.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8kkw2i1.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:40:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v8kkw2i1.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Thu, 02 Feb 2023 15:44:38 +0100") Message-ID: <87tu04oz26.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1675352479; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qjb+/wdRPLPmTBHNSDdidxBP0Lbu4Zu+POpohu1yEY8256RQxTou6c20SrD3zT5GsC5DKx W7NOH6XPF2ZkBoVeRmH6SDgC86E3QRPB+zh5pwuxyy0P8HCgaLw1yQ7e7Vgw2RRcpLUPuL gwGdXHpP/9+pwYgcSDyaDOL7W+I0qzOHpEIUnbbbgLJbYw2d+N4EPvozdTqFpws9/+cDn0 o6990zZOeIv9pe5QDv5/LPrhg+zijVp9CVHisrAN7mkCTpkrOInuRAn23EkHhrUoxbPJeZ JtI+TSrrLECqhy0QT3yT20RZj1OMty9yrkeK0dIRQcFfaBFdHbHfUtUZkCOBhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cgRxowXB; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1675352479; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=YyYZdqCN2Z6Cx7Pl4+QsrAoLNuG7+iqlKX5I6rZs74U=; b=mC/B2CfWEXk3AoTAnN+l1YA8XnCPIJIhWQVlJhdkEyjH0HVNLKNHu0JVuCKE4/Mb+xa5AI xZNtpc5O2U4qYGl3o6zuuiTA88kfmhijKRJHitQYNJNiXW2FOrTVFD4f0m9bMza5nPjDDw nlRm5DxiGLhX8rhiFxyIphkg6tRlSygdlmBIpCGqm3n6EPK8K/oS1aR4COB+R/NR+llvsC sXGtYVcWWaudNpe5H/VuUCwfgLUnmFrdpTP9i3sGVWM79ytV+T0E3visAiL8m9UaW8PrFN qm01qieUbCsPO7MJnhie2SvoX+1JC9DWOA1hhJh8DoI/p3mfBvxuupGfwgEzuQ== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.58 X-Spam-Score: -1.58 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8906611740 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cgRxowXB; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-TUID: n9kdmXLaoWz3 Hi Josselin, Josselin Poiret writes: > Hi Ludo, > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Thanks for the investigation and for reporting it upstream! >> >> Is there a workaround we could apply locally, ideally one that does not >> lead to a world rebuild? > > So, upstream hasn't replied at all to the above proposal. How do we move > forward? I have a patch that still applies on Python 3.9.9 that we can > put into core-updates. Would that be fine? I haven't revisited that patch, but if you are confident it wouldn't break anything in the Python world, core-updates would be a fine place, yes. --=20 Thanks, Maxim