From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id IKgkNunxxmYgPwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:08:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id IKgkNunxxmYgPwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:08:10 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=FFOfC1pr; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Ysr7DwzI; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1724314059; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=0O2eCmbxc/TrxXClElhGv/4lJabeE8DlxEEuXyElkd8=; b=N1zkYz552i0waQTCI3MrxakfBp1Q+e2D4gKOHmvI1T5zDFY1ww+su7cL+iNfgK1jGyAuDE aIa66RW8WWuc3B+8DBhEbzwzwJljbWv5EFpsaLsPbsUw2HbiJeSIY33SCIjxmd/OB0QE2Y 8Y38RHNiyMhwCghS5G4b+TRVQAI5d7+667dBZKBdYO4Db15bFIZvuF7rLhqUI1rKl5Xyom uqGOvm69uYbwq7UWeQos6eOfqq7+vGfJoyBzjOwQyRBrd+8M5VxQASY+LZoXMs3LWmjzap emkdtYTcYrxdzmMNWOl4i/LoW2ZRwp/+VhLde3Qt64HK18WdlWPviEWHjlo+Zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=FFOfC1pr; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Ysr7DwzI; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1724314059; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Kp3MJdQBVzOJXQKOBIC0SF7Pd3gxvGJ5MRoV5YiFQ8VIXGXLkm3Vorm58/SW4z6fEEmkL7 S7CKYa9BO1rQrmCuxlIui34PMI9FuAAo4CN7YvGabNkeNukOv3KDL57P8PRdAYyrTaXP4+ /E5Qf42Yo1FRGDbZuOCN8Zqtx5TBEHeZyV4Tqw94LTdWiu19D6Jb/b4DcB6z4zVW8s42rm td1Oz/5bpg73DFtJjUHuf6NnnQxU47rn2y498vS0uZDmEorIsCylU10EMULZAP8XGoZybh MsrD72Fw0LiGYYTkZWh2V2w5nm4hHOD5A352rIUjU3w9ynm03jfnG1y6vy+nhg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76FA460B99 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2qk-0000IA-IJ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2qj-0000I1-6O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:17 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2qi-00039q-La for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=0O2eCmbxc/TrxXClElhGv/4lJabeE8DlxEEuXyElkd8=; b=FFOfC1prbOFrhXAjSxYhIx4WJESxURld4drPMiwEeXhUR5lQbi1uFIsFZyoVjN1LT9GXv3c571QwG7bCrXI/u1M8a4FNHhGAA+POgObuwzKDWyclx0/IKBWER6fUyVEQRYtP6ezMdDOXXP/eeQGU9W8/nHXwkEhrKCmJ2B+zvgQizW/b4fu0lX3QJTtxW760nV8Q35DuXHI9yBgxaFKGq1GKyCuqEgl0Q3sCbcCPaAevr4mvUprb2ZQRGfRQLAPVLJvmonwl6Cx/3Np4Mq6aPWVZECBnBxfrLKFYtqfh0t7t6bbjV3aetQw0g1+gHh1jRwhXgK4IQidBiRtl60wXhw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2rS-0001ZS-4I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:08:02 -0400 Subject: bug#69106: SBCL enomem on 686 Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 69106 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Howard Cc: 69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 69106@debbugs.gnu.org, glv@posteo.net, christopher@librehacker.com Received: via spool by 69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D69106.17243140716003 (code D ref 69106); Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 69106-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2024 08:07:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2rH-0001Yl-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:51 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:43263) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2rD-0001YR-W5 for 69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:49 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2088F240101 for <69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:06:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1724314016; bh=fygiOo51UE6RVO4YFZH1YObFXe61cQx2fuPpBDCpBYI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=Ysr7DwzIvGsk+rwfbQ0jQ6xHTkE0orP3L3JIv9fAsHK0she7gXifYlB4/A+AjzcFQ LS0wfHNi3q0QvSUn5ZjBdQMatBKNA7QSrKuhpuFO+KjpFAqkDBQ1+HbWIqsiLDpfqo 7VHbcQRkrGdIiZM17usVDh9NgdoravpPYgGdA6YxoKnM6C7ifRu+N1vKi4woope9BT 3kVsaGrNj/cEIQtcuzx+1MaJGAT699a665GJ9TKqS7wIAZJ5fuMIIBqrv0DbPXdur4 1lxrfjucsrETte5ffO3ckPRb8wpnKUJcC1+YgthTIlFXtQRclFfjtPj/su3Muo+AOd ntPQuTMUJ4nKA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4WqG4v0dvBz9rxM; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:06:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-Reply-To: (Christopher Howard's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:48:24 -0900") References: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:06:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87ttfdasm9.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 76FA460B99 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -12.20 X-Spam-Score: -12.20 X-TUID: XNSjp4OuNt1S --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Howard skribis: > Hi, the problem is with these lines: > > ``` > ,@(if (target-ppc32?) > ;; 3072 is too much for this architecture. > `("--dynamic-space-size=2048") > `("--dynamic-space-size=3072")) > ``` > > Package definition simply assumes that all non-ppc32 architectures can handle the larger dynamic space, but apparently not x86. Through experiment, I see the largest dynamic space that works on my old laptop is 2810, but 2048 seems like a more sensible number. Fixed in 803f9d3038d3c3048079c63d51b7b40bff09f17a. Closing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZsbxng8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j97xQD/U+Ik7QcFtfs3gRRarZFIinE46VyW2iO9kcUn vYLYRTwA/0IV2gwDu8auzpw/6NaBW/7hRbOhof1jdZ7RAJ/5TuOC =whyd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--