From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22587: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?edit=E2=80=99?= & =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98M-x?= guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:31:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87shygthz8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8737t4jt1j.fsf@gmail.com> <87oabrr460.fsf@gmail.com> <87twlj6op5.fsf@gmail.com> <878u0bia77.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9ey95mt.fsf@gnu.org> <87y48ahuza.fsf@gmail.com> <8760vd7tzs.fsf@gnu.org> <87ega07nl1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asu6q-00084p-Cx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:32:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asu6k-0003Jz-Pq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:32:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asu6k-0003Jv-NE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1asu6k-0007Kq-JM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:32:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ega07nl1.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:20:58 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Alex Kost Cc: 22587@debbugs.gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-04-19 13:50 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: >>> >>>> It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a >>>> purpose, or something. >>>> >>>> Could you retitle it, or close it, or fix it, whichever is appropriate? >>>> :-) >>> >>> Was it for me? >> >> =E2=80=98To whom it may concern=E2=80=99. :-) >> >>> I think the main purpose of this report was to tell us that "edit" >>> name is confusing. So I would retitle it to "Rename 'guix edit' as it >>> is confusing". But I don't know how; can it be done by sending some >>> control message? >> >> Yes, using the =E2=80=98retitle=E2=80=99 command, described somewhere at >> . > > Sorry, I don't see any mention of 'retitle' there, also I don't find > retitle control message while using emacs-debbugs package. Sorry, it=E2=80=99s at . >> However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the >> solution, and (2) =E2=80=98guix edit=E2=80=99 does what it says IMO, eve= n if it can >> occasionally stumble upon read-only files. > > OK, well I don't know what to do with it then. What about the following > title: =C2=AB"guix edit" name may be confusing=C2=BB? Perfect! :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.