From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#26176: What to do about unmaintained frameworks like webkitgtk@2.4 in Guix? Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 23:27:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87shm7shx7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170319204414.GA23467@jasmine> <20170319221738.rjmsoak3y5otq5vu@abyayala> <20170320065054.GE19779@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq5mX-00032D-MU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:28:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq5mU-0004iR-FY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:28:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq5mU-0004iF-CG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cq5mU-00043q-4n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:28:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170320065054.GE19779@macbook42.flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:50:54 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 26176@debbugs.gnu.org Howdy! Efraim Flashner skribis: > Good news on that front!=20 > > $ guix refresh -l wxwidgets > Building the following 5 packages would ensure 6 dependent packages are > rebuilt: aria-maestosa-1.4.11 wxmaxima-16.04.2 filezilla-3.24.1 > elixir-1.3.2 audacity-2.1.2 BTW, I used: guix graph -t reverse-package webkitgtk@2.4 to find out how things ended up depending on it. > kicad uses wxwidgets built with gtk+-2, and the one that didn't show up > at all, gnucash, uses webkitgtk/gtk+-2, which is the gtk+@2 version of > webkit@2.4. > > Wxwidgets currently is built with webkit@2.4, but it looks like it > supports webkit. > > I'm currently working on testing wxwidgets built with webkit to see if > that takes care of everything currently relying on webkit@ancient other > than gnucash. Looks like it worked pretty well. :-) Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.