From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#33137: [Wishlist] recursive guix lint Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:13:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87sh0nz4ir.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181024123915.GB1297@macbook41> <875zxqup8r.fsf@gnu.org> <20181027203013.GF1297@macbook41> <878t2h66yf.fsf@gnu.org> <20181030073529.GI1297@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYXj-0005fC-5k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:15:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYXf-0005gr-HK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:15:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYXe-0005fV-5h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYXd-00049U-To for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:15:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181030073529.GI1297@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:35:29 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 33137@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > I meant more like "hey, khard can be upgraded to 0.12.2, after I've > checked the upgrade with 'guix lint khard', now I'd like to check the rest > of the dependency tree with 'guix lint --recursive khard' to see if > anything else can be upgraded or has any linter errors." Oh I see. So to me this would be a =E2=80=98guix refresh=E2=80=99 feature = rather than =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99, but I agree it would be nice (and not too hard= to implement.) Thanks, Ludo.=E2=80=99