From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:06:09 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgynezha.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg0i43j.fsf@netris.org>
	<87d0psi1xo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50976)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gbRov-0005jh-Bt
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:07:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gbRos-0000F0-5N
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:07:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59515)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gbRos-0000El-1m
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:07:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gbRor-00064N-Nw
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:07:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33848.B33848.154566397323268@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of
	"Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:01 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 33848@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Pierre,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

>> I don=E2=80=99t think we=E2=80=99ve encountered the problem before.
>
> Actually it does ring a bell for me.  Didn't we have a similar issue with=
 Fish,
> or some dependency?

We did have a problem with Fish but I can no longer find it.  Do you
remember what it was?  Something with C++, no?

>> For now I lean towards looking for a way to address the issue
>> specifically for SBCL.
>
> Don't forget that we currently have 5 Lisp compilers.
> Besides, it's not clear that this can be fixed on the compiler's side, it=
 could
> very well be that patches will be required  on a per-project basis.

I know little about CL but maybe we can find a solution that works for
all five compilers.  At least that would be the first approach I would
suggest following.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.