From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#31162: "guix pull" broke itself Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 11:01:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgx3hnxk.fsf@fhain.coderdojo.berlin> References: <20180415125942.72181370@scratchpost.org> <871sfctdph.fsf@gnu.org> <20180418233958.504dc025@scratchpost.org> <878t9jl721.fsf@gnu.org> <20180419143723.49836d5f@scratchpost.org> <87po2qymxf.fsf@gnu.org> <20180424225755.0acf86c1@scratchpost.org> <20180521105703.0e9865bf@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqgH9-0006t8-Pj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 10:35:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqgH8-0001cr-Jy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 10:35:11 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqgH8-0001cC-4h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 10:35:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqgH8-0000by-0z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 10:35:10 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180521105703.0e9865bf@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Mon, 21 May 2018 10:57:03 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 31162-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi Ludo, > > I've checked guix-packages now and I see: > > $ bzless $(guix build --log-file /gnu/store/q0s172fgb213c4jk7hvgkzsw0i1bq= 6j0-guix-packages.drv) > > ... > 31.4% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 31.7% of 407 files^Mcompiling...= 31.9% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 32.2% of 407 files^Mcompili= ng... 32.4% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 32.7% of 407 files^Mco= mpiling... 32.9% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 33.2% of 407 file= s^Mcompiling... 33.4% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 33.7% of 407= files^Mcompiling... 33.9% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 34.2% o= f 407 files^Mcompiling... 34.4% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 34= .6% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 34.9% of 407 files^Mcompiling... = 35.1% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 35.4% of 407 files^Mcompiling...= 35.6% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 35.9% of 407 files^Mcompili= ng... 36.1% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 36.4% of 407 files^Mco= mpiling... 36.6% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 36.9% of 407 file= s^Mcompiling... 37.1% of 407 files^Mcompiling... > 37.3% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 37.6% of 407 files^Mcompi= ling... 37.8% of 407 files^Mcompiling... 38.1% of 407 files^M= compiling... 38.3% of 407 filesIn thread: > unexpected syntax > In thread: > no code for module (guix licenses) > ^Mcompiling... 38.6% of 407 filesIn thread: > no code for module (guix licenses) > ^Mcompiling... 38.8% of 407 filesIn thread: > no code for module (guix licenses) > ^Mcompiling... 100.0% of 407 files > > (Deleting ~/.cache/guile and ~/.cache/guix didn't help) I believe that this can no longer happen since the new =E2=80=9Cguix pull= =E2=80=9D (aside from the infamous miscompilation bug #27476). I=E2=80=99m closing this, but feel free to reopen if this can be reproduced= with the new =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D implementation. ~~ Ricardo