From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 23:07:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87sgr0e7ot.fsf__30184.3363138445$1563656894$gmane$org@elephly.net>
References: <8736j61n57.fsf@gmail.com> <87o91ugdot.fsf@elephly.net>
 <87ftn5gjzw.fsf@elephly.net> <871ryogu6j.fsf@elephly.net>
 <87r26nfwes.fsf@elephly.net> <87a7dafntp.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAE4v=pjmPSRCiqBauVMhK=CgfzLnUoN_z8UGfzu7A8uAdFMUbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <878ssufajf.fsf@elephly.net> <875znyf0mr.fsf@elephly.net>
 <87zhl9drm6.fsf@elephly.net> <20190720110612.3f33171f@sybil.lepiller.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59671)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1howaJ-0005Mi-1v
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 17:08:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1howaI-0000d6-44
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 17:08:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49127)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1howaI-0000ci-16
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 17:08:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1howaH-0005DA-Rv
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 17:08:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36685.B36685.156365687320013@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <20190720110612.3f33171f@sybil.lepiller.eu>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, 36685@debbugs.gnu.org


Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> writes:

> Le Sat, 20 Jul 2019 10:42:25 +0200,
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> a =C3=A9crit :
>
>> configure: error: Could not find required system headers; install the
>> appropriate files from glibc-headers, libc6-dev and/or libattr-devel,
>> libattr1-dev or use --disable-compile-against-syscalls if necessary.
>
> Can you check the content of config.log? It should tell you what test
> it runs to determine whether attr is present or not.

It=E2=80=99s pretty straight-forward: xattr.h is no longer provided by the =
attr
package.  sys/xattr.h from glibc should be used instead, so I=E2=80=99ve pa=
tched
it.

I fixed another problem in the icedtea 2 build and moved on.  Let=E2=80=99s=
 see
how far I=E2=80=99ll get this time.  In the meantime it would be great to r=
each
consensus on whether we should shrug off the patch that introduces a
memory leak in GNU Classpath 0.93 as part of the bootstrap or if we
should spend more time trying to figure out how we can avoid it.

--
Ricardo