From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Wingo Subject: bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 10:49:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgkyfary.fsf@igalia.com> References: <87eexeu8mo.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k16vdise.fsf@gnu.org> <87woaqpuvz.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imx7D-0001Mf-Og for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 04:50:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imx7C-0003xn-PN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 04:50:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imx7C-0003xB-Am for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 04:50:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imx7C-0003yz-8n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 04:50:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87woaqpuvz.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:08:48 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix Devel , 38529@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri 20 Dec 2019 22:08, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > zimoun writes: > >> - I propose the name "guix shell" > > This is not a bad idea, especially considering that =E2=80=9Cguix environ= ment=E2=80=9D > was meant to get shebang support, so that you could use it as the > interpreter in a script that handles the environment configuration. > > It is also shorter. I like this idea. It would also allow us to deprecate "guix environment" over a period of a year or so, and we can probably show an equivalent "guix shell" invocation in the deprecation message. Andy