From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GPU5HDW6VF+eSwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:30:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wDTfFzW6VF8RGQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:30:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCFF94021E for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kErw2-0004KC-QN for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:30:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kErvv-0004Jo-OZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:30:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kErvu-0002EU-ED for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:30:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kErvu-0005O9-9U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43238: `guix system build -n` to be more informative (builds/substitutes) Resent-From: Vitaliy Shatrov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 43238 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43238@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: "Magst Tom tomaten\?" Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.159938818720663 (code B ref -1); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:30:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2020 10:29:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44882 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kErvf-0005ND-4b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:29:47 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50508) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kErvc-0005N4-Sg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:29:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kErvc-0004IT-MI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:29:44 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:56724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kErva-0002BL-Ba for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:29:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A54E529E4 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:29:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSDQkcEfSq42 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:29:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Vitaliy Shatrov DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1599388177; bh=g7rhL/08k19dSWqps1L7cBofMUiMCJAN2hQT0gGB4ew=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=DIAbKSg2853An/W1mOJ651eL4YBlohmA239VyIVOxDa8t6S74dgnnMRw4Pzo4DzpP CdZs44c+v+wCvuJmE7rg6YzFFK/I8isbBgTskjFE/UOhmH2DNYO4ivWNClu7A2ysqi doiPhNOXL2DptTJdpUp7Z1WUfihN/hAUhBY/VPOMpm8UnoodV98f0Y5r1g3+AhemnS eQhLJTF6JgpN2q3stkbUOZHyfVnUlsSne73xHOytAN09XNOd0A+K8BArWmX8SOYc7R A2Smo3AKJHsH1N26B6mv9yDamI6PmaUjjFpgaJ2BhVGT6XjSzsEWlQRkNb4O6stTpj fBBpZJDD4jMfg== Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 17:30:23 +0700 Message-ID: <87sgbv5ha8.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=guix.vits@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/06 06:29:39 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=DIAbKSg2; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=disroot.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.59 X-TUID: 4YiRKSCJW8vr Hello Guix. I did: `guix system build -n config.scm` I get a message, something like: "3 packages (guix, modules, and ?) would be downloaded." I ran `sudo guix system build config.scm`. Guix told me it will build the linux kernel. It was unexpected. The `guix system build/reconfigure` upgrades the daemon first. Right? So, if `guix` cannot know beforehand will the User get any substitutes.. Maybe: * `guix` should stop and ask in case there is a build ahead? * add a separate 'update-daemon-only' command (or flag) to `system`? Background: With `update-daemon-only`, one can just walk away. Then look-up, if any builds are ahead. Of course i understood that the system-wide config should be keept minimal. So not that big trouble: just i had an substitute offered to me (for kernel), but (as `system build -n` didn't warned me) decided to not use it (as i thought the kernel will not be updated). When i found out that kernel actually going to be build, i canceled it. Then switched to kernel that has substitute (same config, different hash). --- Thank You for the attention, Vitaliy.