From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QDUqKc+0o2DrgwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 14:36:31 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id QGW9JM+0o2ABdwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 12:36:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1132D163DC for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 14:36:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liyxZ-00076q-DK for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:36:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liyx9-00073c-8a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:36:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liyx8-0001xs-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:36:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liyx8-00067Y-6d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48284: Dovecot has two =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98location=E2=80=99?= fields Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48284 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 48284-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48284.162134135823519 (code B ref 48284); Tue, 18 May 2021 12:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 48284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2021 12:35:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liyx4-00067H-1a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:35:58 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]:43836) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liyx1-000672-DE for 48284@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:35:56 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f51.google.com with SMTP id v18so4787577qvx.10 for <48284@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 05:35:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKRMAjz9WRE0mtRpAyf5g2zjLe4U1+BtqXeA2cECeh4=; b=IlSehnAX1TIQTK2CG56Ox+Fb3Wk37VbPacPoXs0ndrfSREWI1DPkL5CHcpz5XjWA6m uffW9oope2804n14zCMoB5c0fr2A9jN4dxcth27wUwv8k5mW7anOJKgyaQ3YbFjWkNFf cYszPu3hLLTDrkLljADYPR3PI7jXbRKP/IVcqVsl3uRT8bgYAiNHCb8bvdjvFZw+pNog iYlsol4vfzWsG2zbqgyT+LBIg063b9vfprQ2nb9szmrFLn93k1VX7x5g6IvunX7ET+9G XPplZA0xiaBIvg3ZMgi5aZ33yARsJ/G9moBQEqsQCmnWmoYdtF4nIMTkrtxvVw1QSM1r 0Z4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKRMAjz9WRE0mtRpAyf5g2zjLe4U1+BtqXeA2cECeh4=; b=RCoZZ5+08AGfJTiMTyLKgGMqU9OObNRmwrgHGpyQjDH4TmpKelNnbmd/XPUci9HEqY aOcQ+9YQYjoMvZwjxL6Cf3k3sRQqHpjlRL/ZoYNtzvQi25WeTlBYd/qdEnRhmjRe/hxb DBiwuFkOTNdLWT3vNrp6N1P3EKqsikXjQDqrlrv/yOX4u5xVwIk1/nqoklRvqgeq9V+8 EA0DiOfih/Lx0RxcPN5gbJQccY5ooFWv3mMoVf8Q2kxip6pzE1otPzfSRGTZkM4nD+4C HoNKpO0QwIEXUtr7bZtadu4Lqp7vY7kW3kaw1gA12STH93/Ujhvr5p2oW9tP8XQXH0dv jEmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uf14p7PsLOhZnCQTVfrsdyxaOdW6n7dUwHNJdKCiZKHr1M+tu Jy+vGsqpG9j/7DXr/ExHeRmTAratDLs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxL1LogQqrrINr+QSzC6Zf9UClvDH3ieOJv/iD6KHWXXG9io68oRH0gA6RRPoaQeVBJPDnG9g== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5281:: with SMTP id v1mr5273328qvr.56.1621341349646; Tue, 18 May 2021 05:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-236-124-184.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.124.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm12506816qkg.102.2021.05.18.05.35.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 May 2021 05:35:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87h7jd8jld.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:35:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7jd8jld.fsf@inria.fr> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sat, 08 May 2021 15:02:06 +0200") Message-ID: <87sg2kmd7g.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48284@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621341391; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=cKRMAjz9WRE0mtRpAyf5g2zjLe4U1+BtqXeA2cECeh4=; b=PfBPCKEfFx1zXd4ypbHDCjSPLb0OfbM8a6+iq9C0mXxkhg0l3gMQpUZbnacT35EY4R1pq1 5WKUbx4EOtPKQ1WGBDvoB/JHsKg7HvZL9e7575snXTq3/Jtd09PEeIBF+Rxp5ajKsgpFjx sVR5orpXQdYr6En1z97Q1Nnf5OLQtIu70jSC6AKwy24cNIO++uwYIT7lYjA3UtzXsffcru XBwDzHaPlspuikFd4B8miP6Fol91pgyT14oYkZubw3uEB2ad2LcMeBZaj1ZAsa+u9XU1BX KSdUoqk4PLFjMFQ2XUZhzX36BXARNrrqqGfNN1DvxBWmLYzcL9ZgDZxeaSwp8w== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621341391; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Q9hZXpanFRnlHhG7Ws5jJYhysIQ/bGygXMkuKdF60xMglqcbVbX7hWV5oRdeNWzuJqVkPP M7cjfSCFFsUv+jLc5+mqwc+37bb5P5b9OJXYPilz1QOQjDZRfd+7v9aJcjdlJwpbEVrJVb D8SlRJcu+cGIZ9uosKkSLC4PqaIka8H31M+cGMLmsYjQMyRTcUDRpcQpX3jBQtRYDuIw6z iNjbGcIKIGAixtQjq1ZriIKjTEYjN7LrDsPWhY/jcp2pOSELr/U/XFrJccc6sVtHb0eTtK +cUnzgw+EMSSbeDxnzOcNOUBs1KZ5ZkckhbyIyX4kgSnOqsntBAYoPg0UuMi4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=IlSehnAX; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.34 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=IlSehnAX; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1132D163DC X-Spam-Score: -1.34 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: nZAckuvHbShh Hi Ludo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > I just noticed this compiler warning: > > gnu/services/mail.scm:431:0: warning: shadows previous definition of `%na= mespace-configuration-location-procedure' at gnu/services/mail.scm:431:0 > : warning: shadows previous definition of `namespace-co= nfiguration-location' at > > > I believe this comes from the fact that =E2=80=98define-configuration=E2= =80=99 > automatically introduces a =E2=80=98location=E2=80=99 field (for the sour= ce code > location of instantiations), which clashes > with this one: > > (location > (string "") > "Physical location of the mailbox. This is in same format as > mail_location, which is also the default for it.") > > I think this was revealed by the fix in commit > dd0826fbf345dfe7289cf943ed2d29edc51d543f. > > Probably the only sane way to address it is by renaming the field above. We could also rename the define-configuration produced %location field accessor to something more explicit such as $name-source-location instead of $name-location, no? I don't think that field is being used much at all, given it was effectively broken prior to the above commit, so renaming it should go mostly unnoticed. Maxim