From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id KnrXFFwKFWNX6QAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 22:28:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id CPIaE1wKFWN7LAEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 22:28:12 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3CBF4232 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 22:28:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50084 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUwDy-0002S2-GT for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:28:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUwDq-0002Rc-Sn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:28:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUwDq-0003Tn-H7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUwDq-0007bH-Cz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57559: guix pull fails on http status code 503 Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 20:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57559 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos Cc: 57559@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57559-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57559.166232323229148 (code B ref 57559); Sun, 04 Sep 2022 20:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 57559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2022 20:27:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUwD1-0007a3-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:27:12 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com ([209.85.167.50]:33765) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUwCz-0007Zo-Vv for 57559@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:27:11 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id br21so10637905lfb.0 for <57559@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=f8J7ogZSuf0CKGMbMVJTsiAJn2mlG+hwfxUzYDQKKyg=; b=WnWQe3H9VA+5M5vuZmoAv8vuDidOo+wS9Iz+A4XOhtIjonBxG/f/cHO0MCvTREEQno NVVqXAP3ySDKJ1LR+qdMvbcunOHvC7PqMTlTUh3F+AUe/uU3D/nbj92o9/t/Itq1Bqz4 hk+Q7OICWBnsXk4oph1EahIWQBg/UNGVeabdq00zxTX1YFwrCJL2WmrJ17djXUqqXVc0 tPrTTCCmhLas9mypxlxxqbZmHk/Camk7x8CMslhBn2zTydWK9yUFmLwiRQV7trsW7bcY XeKaGDXvBmJA9JYfLqTo1WcrOljNXli1lHhj4w4dbZu+09DiP/wHnLpcinrDrldmwvQ3 Zc4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=f8J7ogZSuf0CKGMbMVJTsiAJn2mlG+hwfxUzYDQKKyg=; b=B+Gwktc8UGvLosS/p5Cepb4hmI6LGgkwCBNlGzIFqblGyD5K9FhjowVvGu/GtLwnKV DaM7EMRW1vfe60+vaNToom+FNU4JjmtM9Pli4++WubXFAIBytVStsGvfLLj5i1YXl/px D/KVRfeS795IR6d/WnUtKBaKVIiqtmIUnX+xH7lvqtOUk6nDzwcF2NYnTwDR/9v2JYlg ghSRk9lQyeJ6R+nzXMGAqkSDBTL/Q8gtBIVUIXJp1Vhnzp6ax5fImEPtu1SUpJsbFOWF c6CyFnb5YonaQVPofTk57I2d7eD0kV6oPBZ6GaCsPYZUSE3iexZFHcuSXG6vORCL+nSe XfKA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1fxT1IWLs1u0bcSYlFzn9S6rFAUOQaCWMo3qi4+tK397E56Dow ripCUFlVYqa/Rvd3CgDZlXM8EGc1ZHY72m+8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4J42jOFf0bSJPoWj4LZefqfffRy6r8udJasGfq3wBlZ9MSCMLQZZFHk8I8Ou8Syl9XBPnZ5g== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4837:0:b0:494:adf8:abcb with SMTP id 23-20020ac24837000000b00494adf8abcbmr3917258lft.238.1662323223614; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guix-xps13 (95-27-197-168.broadband.corbina.ru. [95.27.197.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id be32-20020a05651c172000b00268a0ada6d7sm1108909ljb.25.2022.09.04.13.27.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes References: <87wnakn1oq.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 23:27:01 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Maxime Devos's message of "Sat, 3 Sep 2022 19:27:30 +0200") Message-ID: <87sfl6nawa.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1662323292; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=f8J7ogZSuf0CKGMbMVJTsiAJn2mlG+hwfxUzYDQKKyg=; b=qiZwymlYrfS4f7//CPuOsP4opovWJBCK42oJO5QeLnJEg3YgsO7lRTXGQBK52VGuviHuPv UZ6P0k29n4i/XZVp/8Ht6oDeCzExAZxjEO3FVOPPjW+QR1nFwD0E31rDi7B33FpxmcOMd5 Q7ZyOFyo0+jKtZHPnPiWsC2ml03tCOEogi2oO409FRBOjr8UTKfpcBd15NihxZe9XQdy19 DQ2aiOLc/QHu+Jo/iuJHVLWzI6ZVKcGW5clu7euwWmfjcMCzyCCBKZGiQf7dBZsUTTnGbK eLd5abNau2ei/YneHVTvr4lM2PwRz4UdyT5Yx+e62XzAiJ22PrMYHOOats0baA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1662323292; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hfmpI3pxS6lX+L8zBXDasBh6s+tZ89nCInywek4okoW6kalgrODP+21xuwDDaefwK4NODJ 7zOXE8dv2gqBV4Aa18wrLRV+DqVQsc2rrQn6LxQ0lZWxoykOmZZvrpan6IDq1X1RlrTeIy TUzD2gVX2ryPKuzvG1Qj3SoenmlyrgLalYfETdTs6O78orFboAwVAon7/ai5IiEUVpcSu5 e9fNlHotW/PuNrrzzCVz7vUC5llVRx5KWmtflVYqO7cM0T7do/RkkS/Ur0KkSVuwHcZGzM t0LnxgRIOhw+is3EFpVCuWQ9AMHiL90ReYZpWa3jaQxEEYT09zVUWfz1Ft5KhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=WnWQe3H9; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.23 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=WnWQe3H9; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C3CBF4232 X-Spam-Score: 6.23 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: mhH+hpm/E2H+ Maxime Devos writes: > More concretely: > > * if all channels are available --> ok, keep status quo > * if no channels are available --> error, keep status quo > * if some but not all channels are available, and there is at least one > updated channel --> log the missing channels, and update the channels > that _are_ available (but don't 'ignore' the missing channels by > removing them!). > * if some but not all channels are available, and none of the available > channels were updated --> bail out, no progress was made and this > might be due to lack of connectivity instead of lack of updates. > > ? > > Technically, your message can be interpreted as: if I only have a single > channel, the Guix channel, and it isn't available, it should be possible > to ignore it and proceed. (Proceed with what? It's the only channel, > what is there to proceed with.) To actually implement this, we need to > be precise. I'm just a user and unfortunately I don't have a deep understanding of Guix's internals. Your concrete description seems to resonate with my expectations. Thanks. --=20 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes "You cannot even find the ruins..."