From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id UHIaMlzF6mR9YgAAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 05:39:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id UHIaMlzF6mR9YgAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 05:39:08 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF9147C32 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 05:39:08 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=U27urQkp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1693107548; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=CKdsxykJ0FPPUZMpGaRlIS9F8jNArXnAHZMGbsqvk0o=; b=j3T3iCx5bVGx9RaYOhlUz0xRYI23kMig2shhKFvOF2WYPpfBMaklmAoXKAAhJpZfVvvyrM y9CUR4NHrMPleOiMEfyeE0xb0obbwwRg/y3F0UndNdLZfyvCvILz7P4ALhhjpu+axxpZ3M eb6R4jEKf3oGu//A7oS7X9hJ0IzlJSW4DiaOmh8D0bDXTV8WqusHfkJBdAj4fwwnS+j4vF 7l914x2l4k3//kc90fWySslcGNFYpdQ9OhmB7wb2gpfLq4gvnpGT6QB5bRJK7G8DHyO4qs 7SqarkFV8WnbJKvjHB7UqWyxpbx3xeXq/ZnQw7Ewd/d9EdQLG6J2Nw3SsWlMsg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1693107548; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lEZ3v9C5R9tF/xfUZkBWTzLX0zWiRo7Mlqe9z9XRsL6FG6WghkyMs/P2yFnm21DXk5QVot buWyXlQMPy9uvQiE/Q3/Lk835C3YDCZcqwGQZUcPOazWDTtasSbX9GpGVsLTQl5cRlNef4 aPNyCgd6dnlVh995Z0S2zHg9MSYDs2/jsGSvHhd8iDeLga0rNHScA+++u3I1OW0EYtOrGT nin4E7EEo9QtqyULp7TyBigzczATDmldcalKdVpXrRZIDn8Z9jliU+crWAiUdw5ragANwY irwrzRi7e2nkNdoun79WofjjYvU5AMxM2k2iomIKuE8etVyjVGnRJE/G1/t88Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=U27urQkp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qa6c6-000668-Ja; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:38:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qa6c4-000627-Qu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:38:56 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qa6c4-0000ZD-IN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:38:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qa6c9-0001Ad-J9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 03:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65391 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Maxime Devos , 65391@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 65391-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65391.16931075284477 (code B ref 65391); Sun, 27 Aug 2023 03:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 65391) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2023 03:38:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qa6bw-0001A9-BR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:38:48 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]:58720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qa6br-00019o-2z for 65391@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:38:46 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3a85cc7304fso1671253b6e.1 for <65391@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:38:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693107512; x=1693712312; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CKdsxykJ0FPPUZMpGaRlIS9F8jNArXnAHZMGbsqvk0o=; b=U27urQkpamdN3Sx5JXFh9qNaYAwzSQcvWCqj2j3hsGp4sWUlHodp9M+VOp4rvUoZbM f03/wTX1XB9GMVBeREaCwCuk0x9isE8fNju+Xmtz+hz7EVRaJ0M41AZ/QSOzHnxH17R3 NkmYVcKgB1nFYQfr23tPDhYU4O0fwhZ+QwNd5g0t0vM2/o+4yDDzU0KXOAyYRcMog0uh gDmb5zFUB9mv5kWVqiIVXDE/mcNRLWyAzTe+8i2dMs8hjmHn+FhKYADRoKMWOVFPKGNG SjhSXdo9e2euReRGey7qj6m5DQrk+y5Kv/PQ8cq+9hoAYD4W+AKjZGyac9am9gwcU5b3 sZVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693107512; x=1693712312; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CKdsxykJ0FPPUZMpGaRlIS9F8jNArXnAHZMGbsqvk0o=; b=LkbtZQCyKhnY7aoVHjVcJaMX48sxF88B/mXzr9T6USgvGdzBZYmrWw3oX/7CCSrFzm jIXSRItf5NybbrujmahXxJ9yvHidJRSbYQLX6wL2ZAcR/uFXLQ/kSIUKjiRtzxkjk8ke otVlYAi9xcb8LYC3ryZ3ovoH/tCY4Uu96rUj2L/N94hldnuvTpsk8yxsGIA9hliHadto HvJXfGOtgEfSaVQ2FFdytPR2DCD+yjz6ZtTb4kXxLr4oI/rO+Y87eKTo53n5tN0kEMfr sV8xB+y9/XDmpyQFMBx8eAeZXHR6jIblanmu2EHiuRx0wu0ZppsSB4Bra+9fJnPTcq4f 1JNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3FIlWpdsqfnbIehsxrTzPQLjijGheuzP/pEhb/S+7BjAtw6vC x/E+K3Fal+bAJ2WPcEFVgY4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG3fzCOKb/VS27j5gN2KChTalDSivoyyqJSVJ1u65ZOeeMF3Yh+nkpc9iUyWsqNs4aypvTQ7g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:d46:b0:3a7:62ff:24c1 with SMTP id w6-20020a0568080d4600b003a762ff24c1mr8893162oik.46.1693107511778; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-155-106.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.155.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7-20020a0cdb07000000b0064f6f9290bdsm1643264qvk.55.2023.08.26.20.38.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:38:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <295ef8c8-574a-4169-98f3-6d9aaeb773f1@telenet.be> <871qfpxp76.fsf@envs.net> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:38:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871qfpxp76.fsf@envs.net> ("=?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?="'s message of "Sun, 27 Aug 2023 09:13:17 +0800") Message-ID: <87sf85i289.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.81 X-Spam-Score: -4.81 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6BF9147C32 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-TUID: EvAky3d9/dMi Hello, =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 writes: > Maxime Devos writes: > >> For example, naev used to work just fine, yet apparently it doesn't >> anymore: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65390. >> >> Given that Guix has ci.guix.gnu.org, I would expect such new problems >> to be detected and resolved early, and it was detected by >> ci.guix.gnu.org, yet going by issues.guix.gnu.org it was never even >> investigated. > > Yes, honestly I only look for build failures from bug reports, not from > CI if i'm not doing a "request for merge" from another branch. > >> >> (Yes, there is a delay, but that doesn't matter at all, as there's >> this dashboard .) > > I found the dashboard inconvenient to use, it show failures for both > builds and dependencies in the same red color, and can't be searched. > What I usually do is: > > 1. download the job status json with: > wget -O jobs.json 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org/api/jobs?evaluation=3D692229= &system=3Dx86_64-linux' > > 2. use jq to show package names with build failures: > cat jobs.json | jq '. | map(select(.status =3D=3D 1)) | .[].name' -r > > 3. select interested one to investigate (if doing merge, diff the failure= s from > working branch with master). Maybe we should open Cuirass feature requests on our bug tracker to remember what would be valuable to implement. >> Do people really need to report 33% of all jobs >> (https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/668365/dashboard) before those failures >> are taken seriously, instead of the =E2=80=98there don't seem to be that= much >> more build failures from the core-updates/... merge, let's solve them >> later (i.e., never)=E2=80=99 that seems to be status quo? > > Maybe we can automatically report the failures as bugs, say every 7 > days, and remove a package if it still fail to build in 90 days? That's sounds reasonable to me. > As for now, x86_64 master (eval 668365) has 696 build failures, 604 > dependencies failures, 30 unknown (canceld?) failures, total 1330 > failures according to the jobs.json data. > > Should we open a bug report for each of those 696 build failures? I'm not against, though that sounds like a lot of work unless automated. --=20 Thanks, Maxim