From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Bug: missing interface for module (gnutls) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:19:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87r4kfowe8.fsf@tines.lan> References: <87ehgfr1fg.fsf@tines.lan> <87zjz3w3rz.fsf@karetnikov.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U755y-0001Oy-TB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:19:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U755x-0005Kp-Vu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:19:58 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:50321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U755x-0005Ki-RA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:19:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zjz3w3rz.fsf@karetnikov.org> (Nikita Karetnikov's message of "(unknown date)") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nikita Karetnikov Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Nikita Karetnikov writes: > This commit is buggy. I don't see how this could have anything to do with my commit. (gnutls) needs to be in Guile's load path when (guix build download) is compiled, and in your case it apparently isn't. That must be a problem with your specific configuration. I think the reason it came up now is because my commit changed configure.ac, which forced a more complete rebuild than usual. My commit changes the code that sets the guile load path from within the 'guix' script. However, (gnutls) is not part of guix and therefore it is not guix's responsibility to ensure that it is in the guile load path. Furthermore, this didn't happen when you ran the 'guix' script, but rather while compiling (guix build download) using guild. The code I changed has nothing to do with that. Mark