From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#26714: non-intel systems should use grub-efi Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:57:28 -0700 Message-ID: <87r309fz2v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20170430071407.GE28578@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uys-00060l-GW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uyo-0006ck-La for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uyo-0006cS-Hj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uyo-0001XO-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170430071407.GE28578@macbook42.flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2017 10:14:07 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 26714@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Efraim Flashner writes: > I'm starting to stumble my way through building an install image for > aarch64, and I changed gnu/system/install.scm to use 'grub-efi' in place > of 'grub' in the list of packages (~line 333). Grub-efi builds > successfully on armhf and aarch64 and grub does not, and as part of > compiling install.scm grub is built as part of assembling the image. > > guix size grub: 157.5 MiB > guix size grub-efi: 160.5 MiB > > I don't know a lot of how the install image is put together, or if using > grub-efi in place of grub for building the image would be a problem for > non-efi machines, but for non-intel machines at least we should use > grub-efi for the grub calls. Do the system installation tests pass with that change? You can run the following to find out: make check-system =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlkGQagACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp21WQ//ZaIMmk+lmO+59m4KzihWZI69pQ3FYZ7193HjgQ9rEf2vCsAZ56wytH3S Wtn6xnSrOW0tzGf/KXj8NLACby3UEGHuOvS9Sj2wC4AYv+BBqrpcb4/hXacN9owO ocDi8aL377/he40xf/xynnL++97mKPaF9J5lrZhcY9eKJ/OeYSKBYTOps/TrR0L4 /E9BbDiATYxsuTDpvqLBQBCl5dxGVv9MHZlWltw2flL1GWkvkz1aTxRijFlu8Trm T/Pi8di5Oj2nirCyDeL7vi+FifqGipaqazIUyJ1gvmf7rmEhCsV5fJ8LXfQRkURN GAMXkxO1P3hlfkSlbBi4OapKxXdF5K5cnMmlvlxWTPCzekAK6rDpJa/FsQzTO8X5 LPP1DG6gzpmnqiMF9FqrsNiqum4aT83mdd3lsNqPOqoFGonYcPvEtXcl7fETnOaz 5kEr3/peOtZXO+Ktse0lv0nfxdA2kvBheUdvOWTwQsJHR35eoZgp2RI6ZdTsPJza dfprwiGHT6HDaI++TLlGyywLumYMVvNaqde+cWH6WuguZsiMB5g6ZrlcYf5yrmb4 5b1nRhnuxRgGtx2JSYC1lX88vY8sYhknKYULNpy/ljUL+tLw/O86XJ80qmdHgUEY CzkraFyaQqGXePwfmM8cGGtAJx/9hU0CZNIwCgmIeHM58f6ng4Q= =vZTG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--