From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#31720: java-bouncycastle: tests fail and freeze Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:27:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87r2llz4t6.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87602x1p5i.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <8580f9f5a2c701bf8de0b08f43c36e59@lepiller.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQCxO-0005L2-QF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:29:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQCxK-0008Cv-OG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:29:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQCxK-0008Cn-HQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQCxK-0005hQ-4a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:29:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <8580f9f5a2c701bf8de0b08f43c36e59@lepiller.eu> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 31720@debbugs.gnu.org Julien Lepiller writes: > Le 2018-06-05 12:52, Ricardo Wurmus a =C3=A9crit: >> The package java-bouncycastle has a failing test suite on core-updates. >> After the first test fails there is no more progress and the build >> eventually times out. >> >> I have disabled the test suite for now, but we should try to fix this. >> >> The failing test is =E2=80=9Corg.bouncycastle.mail.smime.test.AllTests= =E2=80=9D. >> >> -- >> Ricardo > > I've observed this behavior on master: the test fails, build hangs for > some very long time and then resumes and completes. I'm not sure why > there is a failure and how not to run this specific test though. Yes, you are right. The check phase does succeed after a very long time. -- Ricardo