From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:57:25 -0400 Message-ID: <87r25e2kjz.fsf@netris.org> References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87ef2j1pgt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftmy51kk.fsf@netris.org> <87muh6sib4.fsf@gnu.org> <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org> <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfwpqpb7.fsf@netris.org> <875znt2hlc.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhke97xj.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no> <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> <87o90pgzak.fsf@gnu.org> <87mug9cagh.fsf@netris.org> <87ftlujj1f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0ZZH-0008Py-HE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:59:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0ZZG-0001DT-6q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:59:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0ZZG-0001DC-3r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:59:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ftlujj1f.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:38:36 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> You can reproduce them with the following command from a git checkout at >> commit 9e6256ba0f32ab12d61c914a3fed879dac881762, which is the tip of the >> 'wip-binaries' branch, based on recent 'master': >> >> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=3Di686-linux bootstrap-tarballs >> >> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ git describe >> v1.0.1-2479-g9e6256ba0f >> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=3Di686= -linux bootstrap-tarballs >> /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0 >> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ cd /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp= 23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0 >> mhw@jojen /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs= -0$ sha256sum * >> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b guile-= static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz >> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a linux-= libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz >> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330 mescc-= tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz >> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0 mes-mi= nimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz >> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7 static= -binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz >> >> Do you get the same results? > > I built it on bayfront and got the exact same result: I'm glad to hear it! Marius and Janneke got these exact results as well, albeit at a different commit which should be equivalent. > (I=E2=80=99m actually surprised Guile is 100% reproducible; ISTR there we= re > still issues with gensyms in .go files, but maybe I=E2=80=99m wrong.) It's apparently not reproducible unless built sequentially. I did some preliminary investigation, and my guess is that the gensyms produced by Guile's compiler sometimes depends on whether dependent modules were previously compiled or not. > So, green light, right? Yes! >> To match what 'core-updates-next' expects, it would be good to upload >> the files above, along with digital signatures, to the following new >> directory: >> >> https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/20190815/ > > Unless you disagree, I=E2=80=99ll upload these to ftp.gnu.org (not > alpha.gnu.org, but same directory as you wrote) tomorrow. That's fine, although I guess %bootstrap-base-urls will need to be extended to include the new base URL. Thank you! Mark