From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qEuYCq87t177cgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 23:24:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id uN4gG7w7t15qVQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 23:24:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48211940EDB for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 23:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYpn-0004s9-1L for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:24:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYp8-0004Hg-KQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:24:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYp8-00064i-9c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYp8-0004xR-3s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41116: Guix deploy fails with new version of Herd Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 23:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41116 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Marius Bakke Received: via spool by 41116-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41116.158906660719009 (code D ref 41116); Sat, 09 May 2020 23:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 41116-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2020 23:23:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYoY-0004wX-Td for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:23:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYoW-0004wJ-Tp for 41116-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:23:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYoR-0006O2-8c; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:23:19 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=40862 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jXYoQ-0008Jd-NL; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:23:19 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <877dxog0wf.fsf@komputilo.eu> <87pnbg3coi.fsf@devup.no> <871rnwdj5p.fsf@gnu.org> <875zd7na9y.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <87eeru35jh.fsf@devup.no> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 01:23:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eeru35jh.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Fri, 08 May 2020 15:44:18 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1vsbsm4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41116-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Sassmannshausen , Diego Nicola Barbato Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.49 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.5396284161999]; MX_INVALID(1.00)[cached]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.09), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[fastmail.com]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ludo@gnu.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[fastmail.com:email,posteo.de:email]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: p9t6u3BZNeGb Hi, Marius Bakke skribis: > Diego Nicola Barbato writes: [...] >>> I=E2=80=99ve reverted the patch in 5aa4d2dcf2f4f8786358feb45338893ed08a= 4cd9. >>> >>> Diego: I guess we can reinstate the patch =E2=80=9Clater=E2=80=9D, once= Shepherd 0.8 can >>> be considered widespread. >> >> I'm sorry I broke reconfigure and deploy. I didn't consider testing >> upgrading from before Shepherd 0.8 to after my change and I didn't even >> think of deploy. Going forth I'll leave messing with core functionality >> to the pros. > > Mistakes happen, don't worry about it. Yup! Plus, the person who reviewed the patch, undoubtedly an equally nice person, didn=E2=80=99t notice the issue either. :-) > One thing that would be really useful and can prevent such situations in > the future is to have a "system test" that tries to run reconfigure from > the latest released version of Guix (currently 1.1.0). > > There are already a few Shepherd tests in gnu/tests/base.scm and > gnu/tests/reconfigure.scm that can be used as inspiration. Yes. I was also wondering if it would make sense for services to somehow state the major+minor version they=E2=80=99re targeting. Ludo=E2=80=99.