From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qLinAX4T0l5GNgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 08:04:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id eOwgOX0T0l4VdwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 08:04:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7099194042C for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 08:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46034 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jewTS-0005qW-Gi for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:04:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jewTK-0005o3-L7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:04:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jewTK-0001eK-9d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:04:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jewTK-0008Hq-4W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41603: How To Resolve "guile: warning: failed to install locale" Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 08:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41603 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: David Philipe Gil , David Philipe Gil , zimoun Received: via spool by 41603-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41603.159082579931805 (code D ref 41603); Sat, 30 May 2020 08:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 41603-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2020 08:03:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56896 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jewSd-0008Gu-Dd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:03:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jewSb-0008Gh-E2 for 41603-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:03:17 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jewSW-0001Fg-6K; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:03:12 -0400 Received: from ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no ([84.202.68.75]:51336 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jewSV-0004UP-JQ; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:03:12 -0400 From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: References: <9390eb99-99a5-29ba-24df-e627ab59be62@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 10:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1v13l4z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41603-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-TUID: Pgk6m10ZWT5b --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Philipe Gil via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > Interesting -- ive never heard of guix challenge... > > I ran it and here is my result: > > ''' > > 8,427 store items were analyzed: > =C2=A0 - 3,480 (41.3%) were identical > =C2=A0 - 147 (1.7%) differed > =C2=A0 - 4,800 (57.0%) were inconclusive > > ''' > > So, does this mean that some of the binaries that are being hosted may > be malicious? It means that 147 out of 3627 items that could be found on the remote server were not reproducible. Or about 4%. There are some known offenders such as debug outputs: you can use 'guix challenge =2D-diff=3Ddiffoscope' to get detailed information about the differences. 96% is close to Debian's number: . It would be good to file bugs about those 4% and bring the number closer to zero. :-) "inconclusive" just means that the remote did not have those store items available, so Guix was unable to challenge them. > I am only somewhat "techie" if i built my own binaries is it "easy" to > publish my binaries? Yes: simply running 'guix publish' starts a web server that can be used with --substitute-urls. You'll also need to generate a signing key and authorize it on all clients. There is a service available for 'guix publish', also on foreign distributions. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7SEzwACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPp1yAgA0fJcYoJhxOw30fP3mzsjkOogcEhnZbOcrAHNzNy2BcSWhZjlWROdTIvW 7cD/oVT5fO3sDTL5fhwpIXnaG8XclmXzLOdvDY+wfMm0MX4JNEzSdyB+zNxr0EjF KwQYooKXYk/N/uB5+PnH7u3GQXZYGHL0iobA2ZNUdHDk7mXdxnVa99rmRLIMLGnS DR3xIqKY28WoJxRVkXtkfA3JN+bsoAflyQZJmicx+brMkYiZBkt2Qv42GfJzrTBQ 6uqTaj6s57OQrRnbiE9T4Bt5NysMb6xe9EWVAG9B49eDbCYA4FF6ABgJCgg6wbaD WIAH5oDnZW8sbXQa6j+OlmheNbF6+w== =+lzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--