From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8BX4ENtlkF95BAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:46:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id oN7ODNtlkF9VZAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:46:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AF79400C7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHFh-0007cq-GX for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:46:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHFS-0007ZX-4H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:46:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHFR-0007Xb-Og for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:46:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHFR-0006nx-LK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44112 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Received: via spool by 44112-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44112.160329876026150 (code B ref 44112); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:46:01 +0000 Received: (at 44112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 16:46:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHFQ-0006ni-3U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:46:00 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:41171) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHFN-0006nS-Je for 44112@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:45:58 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB732400FC for <44112@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:45:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1603298751; bh=4JUARpD9Q+AeFjoX/qdZMUUgl+A7JK9nr4RQY+0T8AQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=jZtb9hl4I3E0MI15SLLOw/8Qji044aoB/TO2ck6ZYDPSIOStuXw2FHqPaYn1zaHN2 5rpgMoi+76YMy0bzhecf+9Irvv/xoNDZ98fmb0mC8lQ+JsfBXVBYRWcWDuoW+uOR/b EI4fpVK5KPkjytZ2zSUbR4stM99fEmg7NZxPuw4xVA3U1WjSiABx53Nic1TNpQvvZS GZ0aliXCFV/uwDhbuJ1zLeFPI1cemOOWxs0faVh7pqTsc4dsymmFYqnY2DqCu2w6MH GKnY+F6dDPAO2GCRESeZs1RJrvN0+KIpwndnLtSWzgaief4RWgN0yJQsoiME9A7FFe hcwo+Po/y6YWw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CGbwD0Y1xz6tn1; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:45:47 +0200 (CEST) References: <86o8kw80bl.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnzjzr77.fsf@yamatai> <87y2jzzm3d.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1przfwo.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44112@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=jZtb9hl4; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: C0mOvL1gKGgM --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain zimoun skribis: >> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify >> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible... > >Thanks for the explanation. A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could be fixed [2]. We'll see... [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/ [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX5Bltw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/HgAD/UNRHvLALDFFdm71pw9wUxnTaLnrAzy//ifOO O+ZuRroA/1U01XRKLlVACRVGA+xqEj0LDgY9iED5rJx0+hIZTVA4 =Rmx0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--